Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:01:08 -0800 revbranchcache: move entry writing to a separate function
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:01:08 -0800] rev 24375
revbranchcache: move entry writing to a separate function This moves the actual writing of entries to the cache to a separate function. This will allow us to use it in multiple places. Ex: in one place we will write dummy entries, and in another place we will write real data.
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:57:51 -0800 revbranchcache: store repo on the object
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:57:51 -0800] rev 24374
revbranchcache: store repo on the object Previously we would instantiate the revbranchcache with a repo object, use it briefly, then require it be passed in every time we wanted to fetch any information. This seems unnecessary since it's obviously specific to that repo (since it was constructed with it). This patch stores the repo on the revbranchcache object, and removes the repo parameter from the various functions on that class. This has the other nice benefit of removing the double-revbranchcache-read that existed before (it was read once for the branch revset, and once for the repo.revbranchcache).
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:53:48 -0800 revbranchcache: move out of branchmap onto localrepo
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:53:48 -0800] rev 24373
revbranchcache: move out of branchmap onto localrepo Previously the revbranchcache was a field inside the branchmap. This is bad for a couple reasons: 1) There can be multiple branchmaps per repo (one for each filter level). There can only be one revbranchcache per repo. In fact, a revbranchcache could only exist on a branchmap that was for the unfiltered view, so you could have branchmaps exist for which you couldn't have a revbranchcache. It was funky. 2) The write lifecycle for the revbranchcache is going to be different from the branchmap (branchmap is greedily written early on, revbranchcache should be lazily computed and written). This patch moves the revbranchcache to live as a field on the localrepo (alongside self._branchmap). This will allow us to handle it's lifecycle differently, which will let us move it to be lazily computed in future patches.
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:29:56 -0700 revbranchcache: add test for when the cache is not writable
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:29:56 -0700] rev 24372
revbranchcache: add test for when the cache is not writable The revbranchecache code already handled the case when the cache file wasn't writable, but let's add a test as well so future changes don't regress this.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip