Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:07:25 -0700 test-mq-strip.t: add a test for strip --keep with clean working dir stable
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:07:25 -0700] rev 19090
test-mq-strip.t: add a test for strip --keep with clean working dir This helped uncover a bug in a patchset I've been writing.
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:41:42 +0200 largefiles: use repo.wwrite for writing standins (issue3909) stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:41:42 +0200] rev 19089
largefiles: use repo.wwrite for writing standins (issue3909)
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:04:01 +0200 largefiles: drop repo wrapping detection stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:04:01 +0200] rev 19088
largefiles: drop repo wrapping detection After 257afe5489d4 I see: $ hg id -q largefiles: repo method 'commit' appears to have already been wrapped by another extension: largefiles may behave incorrectly largefiles: repo method 'push' appears to have already been wrapped by another extension: largefiles may behave incorrectly be207d9b7e4b The warning is bad: * The message gives no hint what the problem is and how it can be resolved. The message is useless. * Largefiles do have its share of problems, but I don't think I ever have seen a problem where this warning would have helped. The 'may' in the warning seems like an exaggeration of the risk. Having largefiles enabled in combination with for instance mq, hggit and hgsubversion causes a warning (depending on the configuration order) but do not cause problems. Extensions might of course be incompatible, but they can be that in many other ways. The check and the message are incorrect. It would thus be better to remove the check and the warning completely. Before 257afe5489d4 the check always failed. That change made the check work more like intended ... but the intention was wrong. This change will thus also back that change out.
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:36:12 +0900 config: discard "%unset" values defined in the other files read in previously stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:36:12 +0900] rev 19087
config: discard "%unset" values defined in the other files read in previously Before this patch, "%unset" can't unset values defined in the other files read in previously, even though online help document says that it can. It can unset only values defined in the same configuration file. For example, the value defined in "~/.hgrc" can't be unset by "%unset" in ".hg/hgrc" of the repository. This patch records "%unset"-ed values in "config.parse()", and discards corresponding values in "config.update()".
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip