changeset 153:53e4007ac24f

Fix: the first workflow was called sysadmin instead of the (now) correct 'log keeping'.
author Arne Babenhauserheide <bab@draketo.de>
date Tue, 12 May 2009 08:30:24 +0200
parents 1a01a60eeaf5
children 08f4b19d865e
files hgscm/templates/workflow_guide.html
diffstat 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/hgscm/templates/workflow_guide.html	Tue May 12 08:28:27 2009 +0200
+++ b/hgscm/templates/workflow_guide.html	Tue May 12 08:30:24 2009 +0200
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
 
 The second workflow is still very easy: You're a lone developer and you want to use Mercurial to keep track of your own changes. 
 
-It works just like the sysadmin workflow, with the difference that you go back to earlied changes at times. 
+It works just like the log keeping workflow, with the difference that you go back to earlied changes at times. 
 
 To start a new project, you initialize a repository, add your files and commit whenever you finished a part of your work. 
 
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
 
 <h5>Seeing an earlier revision</h5>
 
-Different from the sysadmin workflow, you'll want to go back in history at times and undo some changes, for example because it introduced a bug. 
+Different from the log keeping workflow, you'll want to go back in history at times and undo some changes, for example because it introduced a bug. 
 
 To look at a previous version of your code, you can use update. Let's assume that you want to see revision 3.