tests/test-rename-merge1.t

merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally

If a file is not present on the local side, and it's unchanged between other
merge parent and ancestor, we don't use any action, neither we had a if-else
branch for that condition. This leads to bid-merge missing that there is a
such action possible which can be performed.

As test changes demonstrate, we now choose the locally deleted side instead
of choosing the remote one consistently. This is also wrong behavior which is
resulted because of missing possible action. It will be fixed in next patch.

This whole logic is not acurrate as we should prompt user on what to do
when this kind of criss-cross merge is in play.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8940

  $ hg init

  $ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc

  $ echo foo > a
  $ echo foo > a2
  $ hg add a a2
  $ hg ci -m "start"

  $ hg mv a b
  $ hg mv a2 b2
  $ hg ci -m "rename"

  $ hg co 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo blahblah > a
  $ echo blahblah > a2
  $ hg mv a2 c2
  $ hg ci -m "modify"
  created new head

  $ hg merge -y --debug
    unmatched files in local:
     c2
    unmatched files in other:
     b
     b2
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     on local side:
      src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
     on remote side:
      src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
      src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
  note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
   b2
   c2
   preserving a for resolve of b
  removing a
   b2: remote created -> g
  getting b2
   b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging a and b to b
  my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
   premerge successful
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status -AC
  M b
    a
  M b2
  R a
  C c2

  $ cat b
  blahblah

  $ hg ci -m "merge"

  $ hg debugindex b
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000
       1       3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f

  $ hg debugrename b
  b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66

This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames

  $ hg cp b b3
  $ hg cp b b4
  $ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
  $ hg up '.^'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg rm b3 b4
  $ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'

We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)

  $ hg cp b b3
  $ hg mv b b4
  $ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
  $ hg up '.^'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Check for issue2642

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t

  $ echo c0 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm0

  $ hg up null -q
  $ echo c1 > f1 # backport
  $ hg ci -Aqm1
  $ hg mv f1 f2
  $ hg ci -qm2

  $ hg up 0 -q
  $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
  $ hg ci -qm3

  $ hg merge 2
  merging f1 and f2 to f2
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat f2
  c0

  $ cd ..

Check for issue2089

  $ hg init repo2089
  $ cd repo2089

  $ echo c0 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm0

  $ hg up null -q
  $ echo c1 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm1

  $ hg up 0 -q
  $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
  $ echo c2 > f1
  $ hg ci -qm2

  $ hg up 1 -q
  $ hg mv f1 f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm3

  $ hg up 2 -q
  $ hg merge 3
  merging f1 and f2 to f2
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat f2
  c2

  $ cd ..

Check for issue3074

  $ hg init repo3074
  $ cd repo3074
  $ echo foo > file
  $ hg add file
  $ hg commit -m "added file"
  $ hg mv file newfile
  $ hg commit -m "renamed file"
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg rm file
  $ hg commit -m "deleted file"
  created new head
  $ hg merge --debug
    unmatched files in other:
     newfile
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     on remote side:
      src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
  note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
   newfile
   newfile: remote created -> g
  getting newfile
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status
  M newfile
  $ cd ..

Create x and y, then modify y and rename x to z on one side of merge, and
modify x and rename y to z on the other side.
  $ hg init conflicting-target
  $ cd conflicting-target
  $ echo x > x
  $ echo y > y
  $ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y'
  $ hg mv x z
  $ echo foo >> y
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify y, rename x to z'
  $ hg co -q 0
  $ hg mv y z
  $ echo foo >> x
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify x, rename y to z'
# We should probably tell the user about the conflicting rename sources.
# Depending on which side they pick, we should take that rename and get
# the changes to the source from the other side. The unchanged file should
# remain.
  $ hg merge --debug 1 -t :merge3
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     on local side:
      src: 'y' -> dst: 'z' *
     on remote side:
      src: 'x' -> dst: 'z' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: 5151c134577e, local: 07fcbc9a74ed+, remote: f21419739508
   preserving z for resolve of z
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   z: both renamed from y -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge3' for z (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging z
  my z@07fcbc9a74ed+ other z@f21419739508 ancestor y@5151c134577e
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ ls
  x
  z
  $ cat x
  x
  foo
# 'z' should have had the added 'foo' line
  $ cat z
  x