rust/hg-core/src/dagops.rs

rust: bump to memmap2 0.5.3, micro-timer 0.4.0, and crossbeam-channel 0.5.0

The merge in 12adf8c695ed had conflicts in rust/Cargo.lock and
rust/hg-core/Cargo.toml . Let's ignore rust/Cargo.lock - it is regenerated.

For rust/hg-core/Cargo.toml, stable had dd6b67d5c256 "rust: fix unsound
`OwningDirstateMap`" which introduced ouroboros (and dropped
stable_deref_trait).

Default had ec8d9b5a5e7c "rust-hg-core: upgrade dependencies" which had a lot
of churn bumping minimum versions - also patch versions. It is indeed a good
idea to bump to *allow* use of latest package. That means that major versions
should be bumped for packages after 1.0, and for packages below 1.0 minor
versions should be bumped too. But it doesn't work to try enforce a policy of
using latest patch by bumping versions at arbitrary times.

For good or bad, the merge doesn't seem to have resolved the conflicts
correctly, and many of the minor "upgrade dependencies" were lost again.

Unfortunately, it also lost the bump of memmap2 to 0.5.3, which is needed for
Fedora packaging where 0.4 isn't available. Same with micro-timer bump to 0.4
(which already is used in rhg). crossbeam-channel bump was also lost.

This change fixes that regression by redoing these "important" lines of the
merge "correctly".

I propose this for stable, even though dependency changes on stable branches
are annoying.

// dagops.rs
//
// Copyright 2019 Georges Racinet <[e-mail]>
//
// This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
// GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

//! Miscellaneous DAG operations
//!
//! # Terminology
//! - By *relative heads* of a collection of revision numbers (`Revision`), we
//!   mean those revisions that have no children among the collection.
//! - Similarly *relative roots* of a collection of `Revision`, we mean those
//!   whose parents, if any, don't belong to the collection.
use super::{Graph, GraphError, Revision, NULL_REVISION};
use crate::ancestors::AncestorsIterator;
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashSet};

fn remove_parents<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
    graph: &impl Graph,
    rev: Revision,
    set: &mut HashSet<Revision, S>,
) -> Result<(), GraphError> {
    for parent in graph.parents(rev)?.iter() {
        if *parent != NULL_REVISION {
            set.remove(parent);
        }
    }
    Ok(())
}

/// Relative heads out of some revisions, passed as an iterator.
///
/// These heads are defined as those revisions that have no children
/// among those emitted by the iterator.
///
/// # Performance notes
/// Internally, this clones the iterator, and builds a `HashSet` out of it.
///
/// This function takes an `Iterator` instead of `impl IntoIterator` to
/// guarantee that cloning the iterator doesn't result in cloning the full
/// construct it comes from.
pub fn heads<'a>(
    graph: &impl Graph,
    iter_revs: impl Clone + Iterator<Item = &'a Revision>,
) -> Result<HashSet<Revision>, GraphError> {
    let mut heads: HashSet<Revision> = iter_revs.clone().cloned().collect();
    heads.remove(&NULL_REVISION);
    for rev in iter_revs {
        if *rev != NULL_REVISION {
            remove_parents(graph, *rev, &mut heads)?;
        }
    }
    Ok(heads)
}

/// Retain in `revs` only its relative heads.
///
/// This is an in-place operation, so that control of the incoming
/// set is left to the caller.
/// - a direct Python binding would probably need to build its own `HashSet`
///   from an incoming iterable, even if its sole purpose is to extract the
///   heads.
/// - a Rust caller can decide whether cloning beforehand is appropriate
///
/// # Performance notes
/// Internally, this function will store a full copy of `revs` in a `Vec`.
pub fn retain_heads<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
    graph: &impl Graph,
    revs: &mut HashSet<Revision, S>,
) -> Result<(), GraphError> {
    revs.remove(&NULL_REVISION);
    // we need to construct an iterable copy of revs to avoid itering while
    // mutating
    let as_vec: Vec<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
    for rev in as_vec {
        if rev != NULL_REVISION {
            remove_parents(graph, rev, revs)?;
        }
    }
    Ok(())
}

/// Roots of `revs`, passed as a `HashSet`
///
/// They are returned in arbitrary order
pub fn roots<G: Graph, S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
    graph: &G,
    revs: &HashSet<Revision, S>,
) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
    let mut roots: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new();
    for rev in revs {
        if graph
            .parents(*rev)?
            .iter()
            .filter(|p| **p != NULL_REVISION)
            .all(|p| !revs.contains(p))
        {
            roots.push(*rev);
        }
    }
    Ok(roots)
}

/// Compute the topological range between two collections of revisions
///
/// This is equivalent to the revset `<roots>::<heads>`.
///
/// Currently, the given `Graph` has to implement `Clone`, which means
/// actually cloning just a reference-counted Python pointer if
/// it's passed over through `rust-cpython`. This is due to the internal
/// use of `AncestorsIterator`
///
/// # Algorithmic details
///
/// This is a two-pass swipe inspired from what `reachableroots2` from
/// `mercurial.cext.parsers` does to obtain the same results.
///
/// - first, we climb up the DAG from `heads` in topological order, keeping
///   them in the vector `heads_ancestors` vector, and adding any element of
///   `roots` we find among them to the resulting range.
/// - Then, we iterate on that recorded vector so that a revision is always
///   emitted after its parents and add all revisions whose parents are already
///   in the range to the results.
///
/// # Performance notes
///
/// The main difference with the C implementation is that
/// the latter uses a flat array with bit flags, instead of complex structures
/// like `HashSet`, making it faster in most scenarios. In theory, it's
/// possible that the present implementation could be more memory efficient
/// for very large repositories with many branches.
pub fn range(
    graph: &(impl Graph + Clone),
    roots: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>,
    heads: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>,
) -> Result<BTreeSet<Revision>, GraphError> {
    let mut range = BTreeSet::new();
    let roots: HashSet<Revision> = roots.into_iter().collect();
    let min_root: Revision = match roots.iter().cloned().min() {
        None => {
            return Ok(range);
        }
        Some(r) => r,
    };

    // Internally, AncestorsIterator currently maintains a `HashSet`
    // of all seen revision, which is also what we record, albeit in an ordered
    // way. There's room for improvement on this duplication.
    let ait = AncestorsIterator::new(graph.clone(), heads, min_root, true)?;
    let mut heads_ancestors: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new();
    for revres in ait {
        let rev = revres?;
        if roots.contains(&rev) {
            range.insert(rev);
        }
        heads_ancestors.push(rev);
    }

    for rev in heads_ancestors.into_iter().rev() {
        for parent in graph.parents(rev)?.iter() {
            if *parent != NULL_REVISION && range.contains(parent) {
                range.insert(rev);
            }
        }
    }
    Ok(range)
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {

    use super::*;
    use crate::testing::SampleGraph;

    /// Apply `retain_heads()` to the given slice and return as a sorted `Vec`
    fn retain_heads_sorted(
        graph: &impl Graph,
        revs: &[Revision],
    ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
        let mut revs: HashSet<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
        retain_heads(graph, &mut revs)?;
        let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
        as_vec.sort();
        Ok(as_vec)
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_retain_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
        assert_eq!(retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![5, 6]);
        assert_eq!(
            retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
            vec![1, 6, 12]
        );
        assert_eq!(
            retain_heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
            vec![3, 5, 8, 9]
        );
        Ok(())
    }

    /// Apply `heads()` to the given slice and return as a sorted `Vec`
    fn heads_sorted(
        graph: &impl Graph,
        revs: &[Revision],
    ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
        let heads = heads(graph, revs.iter())?;
        let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = heads.iter().cloned().collect();
        as_vec.sort();
        Ok(as_vec)
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
        assert_eq!(heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![5, 6]);
        assert_eq!(
            heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
            vec![1, 6, 12]
        );
        assert_eq!(
            heads_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
            vec![3, 5, 8, 9]
        );
        Ok(())
    }

    /// Apply `roots()` and sort the result for easier comparison
    fn roots_sorted(
        graph: &impl Graph,
        revs: &[Revision],
    ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
        let set: HashSet<_> = revs.iter().cloned().collect();
        let mut as_vec = roots(graph, &set)?;
        as_vec.sort();
        Ok(as_vec)
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_roots() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
        assert_eq!(roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 5, 6])?, vec![4]);
        assert_eq!(
            roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[4, 1, 6, 12, 0])?,
            vec![0, 4, 12]
        );
        assert_eq!(
            roots_sorted(&SampleGraph, &[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])?,
            vec![1, 8]
        );
        Ok(())
    }

    /// Apply `range()` and convert the result into a Vec for easier comparison
    fn range_vec(
        graph: impl Graph + Clone,
        roots: &[Revision],
        heads: &[Revision],
    ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> {
        range(&graph, roots.iter().cloned(), heads.iter().cloned())
            .map(|bs| bs.into_iter().collect())
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_range() -> Result<(), GraphError> {
        assert_eq!(range_vec(SampleGraph, &[0], &[4])?, vec![0, 1, 2, 4]);
        assert_eq!(range_vec(SampleGraph, &[0], &[8])?, vec![]);
        assert_eq!(
            range_vec(SampleGraph, &[5, 6], &[10, 11, 13])?,
            vec![5, 10]
        );
        assert_eq!(
            range_vec(SampleGraph, &[5, 6], &[10, 12])?,
            vec![5, 6, 9, 10, 12]
        );
        Ok(())
    }
}