annotate tests/test-batching.py @ 40393:229d23cdb203

exchangev2: support fetching shallow files history

This commit teaches the exchangev2 client code to handle fetching shallow
files data.

Only shallow fetching of files data is supported: shallow fetching of
changeset and manifest data is explicitly not yet supported.

Previously, we would fetch file revisions for changesets that were received
by the current pull operation. In the new model, we calculate the set of
"relevant" changesets given the pull depth and only fetch files data for
those changesets.

We also teach the "filesdata" command invocation to vary parameters as needed.

The implementation here is far from complete or optimal. Subsequent pulls will
end up re-fetching a lot of files data. But the application of this data should
mostly be a no-op on the client, so it isn't a big deal.

Depending on the order file revisions are fetched in, revisions could get
inserted with the wrong revision number relationships. I think the best way
to deal with this is to remove revision numbers from storage and to either
dynamically derive them (by reconstructing a DAG from nodes/parents) or remove
revision numbers from the file storage interface completely.

A missing API that we'll likely want to write pretty soon is "ensure files
for revision(s) are present." We can kind of cajole exchangev2.pull() to do
this. But it isn't very efficient. For example, in simple cases like
widening the store to obtain data for a single revision, it is probably
more efficient to walk the manifest and find exactly which file revisions
are missing and to make explicit requests for just their data. In more
advanced cases, asking the server for all files data may be more efficient,
even though it requires sending data the client already has. There is tons
of room for future experimentation here. And TBH I'm not sure what the
final state will be.

Anyway, this commit gets us pretty close to being able to have shallow
and narrow checkouts with exchangev2/sqlite storage. Close enough that a
minimal extension should be able to provide fill in the gaps until the code
in core stabilizes and there is a user-facing way to trigger the
narrow/shallow bits from `hg clone` without also implying using of the
narrow extension...

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5169

# test-batching.py - tests for transparent command batching
#
# Copyright 2011 Peter Arrenbrecht <[e-mail]>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function

import contextlib

from mercurial import (
    localrepo,
    wireprotov1peer,

)

# equivalent of repo.repository
class thing(object):
    def hello(self):
        return "Ready."

# equivalent of localrepo.localrepository
class localthing(thing):
    def foo(self, one, two=None):
        if one:
            return "%s and %s" % (one, two,)
        return "Nope"
    def bar(self, b, a):
        return "%s und %s" % (b, a,)
    def greet(self, name=None):
        return "Hello, %s" % name

    @contextlib.contextmanager
    def commandexecutor(self):
        e = localrepo.localcommandexecutor(self)
        try:
            yield e
        finally:
            e.close()

# usage of "thing" interface
def use(it):

    # Direct call to base method shared between client and server.
    print(it.hello())

    # Direct calls to proxied methods. They cause individual roundtrips.
    print(it.foo("Un", two="Deux"))
    print(it.bar("Eins", "Zwei"))

    # Batched call to a couple of proxied methods.

    with it.commandexecutor() as e:
        ffoo = e.callcommand('foo', {'one': 'One', 'two': 'Two'})
        fbar = e.callcommand('bar', {'b': 'Eins', 'a': 'Zwei'})
        fbar2 = e.callcommand('bar', {'b': 'Uno', 'a': 'Due'})

    print(ffoo.result())
    print(fbar.result())
    print(fbar2.result())

# local usage
mylocal = localthing()
print()
print("== Local")
use(mylocal)

# demo remoting; mimicks what wireproto and HTTP/SSH do

# shared

def escapearg(plain):
    return (plain
            .replace(':', '::')
            .replace(',', ':,')
            .replace(';', ':;')
            .replace('=', ':='))
def unescapearg(escaped):
    return (escaped
            .replace(':=', '=')
            .replace(':;', ';')
            .replace(':,', ',')
            .replace('::', ':'))

# server side

# equivalent of wireproto's global functions
class server(object):
    def __init__(self, local):
        self.local = local
    def _call(self, name, args):
        args = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args)
        return getattr(self, name)(**args)
    def perform(self, req):
        print("REQ:", req)
        name, args = req.split('?', 1)
        args = args.split('&')
        vals = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args)
        res = getattr(self, name)(**vals)
        print("  ->", res)
        return res
    def batch(self, cmds):
        res = []
        for pair in cmds.split(';'):
            name, args = pair.split(':', 1)
            vals = {}
            for a in args.split(','):
                if a:
                    n, v = a.split('=')
                    vals[n] = unescapearg(v)
            res.append(escapearg(getattr(self, name)(**vals)))
        return ';'.join(res)
    def foo(self, one, two):
        return mangle(self.local.foo(unmangle(one), unmangle(two)))
    def bar(self, b, a):
        return mangle(self.local.bar(unmangle(b), unmangle(a)))
    def greet(self, name):
        return mangle(self.local.greet(unmangle(name)))
myserver = server(mylocal)

# local side

# equivalent of wireproto.encode/decodelist, that is, type-specific marshalling
# here we just transform the strings a bit to check we're properly en-/decoding
def mangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) + 1) for c in s)
def unmangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) - 1) for c in s)

# equivalent of wireproto.wirerepository and something like http's wire format
class remotething(thing):
    def __init__(self, server):
        self.server = server
    def _submitone(self, name, args):
        req = name + '?' + '&'.join(['%s=%s' % (n, v) for n, v in args])
        return self.server.perform(req)
    def _submitbatch(self, cmds):
        req = []
        for name, args in cmds:
            args = ','.join(n + '=' + escapearg(v) for n, v in args)
            req.append(name + ':' + args)
        req = ';'.join(req)
        res = self._submitone('batch', [('cmds', req,)])
        for r in res.split(';'):
            yield r

    @contextlib.contextmanager
    def commandexecutor(self):
        e = wireprotov1peer.peerexecutor(self)
        try:
            yield e
        finally:
            e.close()

    @wireprotov1peer.batchable
    def foo(self, one, two=None):
        encargs = [('one', mangle(one),), ('two', mangle(two),)]
        encresref = wireprotov1peer.future()
        yield encargs, encresref
        yield unmangle(encresref.value)

    @wireprotov1peer.batchable
    def bar(self, b, a):
        encresref = wireprotov1peer.future()
        yield [('b', mangle(b),), ('a', mangle(a),)], encresref
        yield unmangle(encresref.value)

    # greet is coded directly. It therefore does not support batching. If it
    # does appear in a batch, the batch is split around greet, and the call to
    # greet is done in its own roundtrip.
    def greet(self, name=None):
        return unmangle(self._submitone('greet', [('name', mangle(name),)]))

# demo remote usage

myproxy = remotething(myserver)
print()
print("== Remote")
use(myproxy)