annotate tests/test-addremove.t @ 19636:6bbce5efc67b

mq: look for modified subrepos when checking for local changes

It was possible to apply, unapply, fold, patches (etc) with modified subrepos,
which resulted in surprising behavior. For example it was easy to apply a patch
with a modified subrepo, and then the refresh it and accidentally end up
including the modified subrepo on the refreshed patch.

A test has been added to verify this new check.


# HG changeset patch
# User Angel Ezquerra <[e-mail]>
# Date 1375742979 -7200
#      Tue Aug 06 00:49:39 2013 +0200
# Node ID a5c90acff5e61aae714ba6c9457d766c54b4f124
# Parent  6ac206fb6f27492a98f46bbff090407ee1b1de72
mq: look for modified subrepos when checking for local changes

It was possible to apply, unapply, fold, patches (etc) with modified subrepos,
which resulted in surprising behavior. For example it was easy to apply a patch
with a modified subrepo, and then the refresh it and accidentally end up
including the modified subrepo on the refreshed patch.

A test has been added to verify this new check.

  $ hg init rep
  $ cd rep
  $ mkdir dir
  $ touch foo dir/bar
  $ hg -v addremove
  adding dir/bar
  adding foo
  $ hg -v commit -m "add 1"
  dir/bar
  foo
  committed changeset 0:6f7f953567a2
  $ cd dir/
  $ touch ../foo_2 bar_2
  $ hg -v addremove
  adding dir/bar_2
  adding foo_2
  $ hg -v commit -m "add 2"
  dir/bar_2
  foo_2
  committed changeset 1:e65414bf35c5
  $ cd ../..

  $ hg init sim
  $ cd sim
  $ echo a > a
  $ echo a >> a
  $ echo a >> a
  $ echo c > c
  $ hg commit -Ama
  adding a
  adding c
  $ mv a b
  $ rm c
  $ echo d > d
  $ hg addremove -n -s 50 # issue 1696
  removing a
  adding b
  removing c
  adding d
  recording removal of a as rename to b (100% similar)
  $ hg addremove -s 50
  removing a
  adding b
  removing c
  adding d
  recording removal of a as rename to b (100% similar)
  $ hg commit -mb
  $ cd ..