tests/test-push-validation.t

hgweb: fail if an invalid command was supplied in url path (issue4071)

Traditionally, the way to specify a command for hgweb was to use url query
arguments (e.g. "?cmd=batch"). If the command is unknown to hgweb, it gives an
error (e.g. "400 no such method: badcmd").

But there's also another way to specify a command: as a url path fragment (e.g.
"/graph"). Before, hgweb was made forgiving (looks like it was made in
44c5157474e7) and user could put any unknown command in the url. If hgweb
couldn't understand it, it would just silently fall back to the default
command, which depends on the actual style (e.g. for paper it's shortlog, for
monoblue it's summary). This was inconsistent and was breaking some tools that
rely on http status codes (as noted in the issue4071). So this patch changes
that behavior to the more consistent one, i.e. hgweb will now return "400 no
such method: badcmd".

So if some tool was relying on having an invalid command return http status
code 200 and also have some information, then it will stop working. That is, if
somebody typed foobar when they really meant shortlog (and the user was lucky
enough to choose a style where the default command is shortlog too), that fact
will now be revealed.

Code-wise, the changed if block is only relevant when there's no "?cmd" query
parameter (i.e. only when command is specified as a url path fragment), and
looks like the removed else branch was there only for falling back to default
command. With that removed, the rest of the code works as expected: it looks at
the command, and if it's not known, raises a proper ErrorResponse exception
with an appropriate message.

Evidently, there were no tests that required the old behavior. But, frankly, I
don't know any way to tell if anyone actually exploited such forgiving behavior
in some in-house tool.

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test

  $ cat > .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [server]
  > validate=1
  > EOF

  $ echo alpha > alpha
  $ echo beta > beta
  $ hg addr
  adding alpha
  adding beta
  $ hg ci -m 1

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone test test-clone
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Test spurious filelog entries:

  $ cd test-clone
  $ echo blah >> beta
  $ cp .hg/store/data/beta.i tmp1
  $ hg ci -m 2
  $ cp .hg/store/data/beta.i tmp2
  $ hg -q rollback
  $ mv tmp2 .hg/store/data/beta.i
  $ echo blah >> beta
  $ hg ci -m '2 (corrupt)'

Expected to fail:

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
   beta@1: dddc47b3ba30 not in manifests
  2 files, 2 changesets, 4 total revisions
  1 integrity errors encountered!
  (first damaged changeset appears to be 1)
  [1]

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/test (glob)
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: received spurious file revlog entry
  [255]

  $ hg -q rollback
  $ mv tmp1 .hg/store/data/beta.i
  $ echo beta > beta

Test missing filelog entries:

  $ cp .hg/store/data/beta.i tmp
  $ echo blah >> beta
  $ hg ci -m '2 (corrupt)'
  $ mv tmp .hg/store/data/beta.i

Expected to fail:

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
   beta@1: dddc47b3ba30 in manifests not found
  2 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions
  1 integrity errors encountered!
  (first damaged changeset appears to be 1)
  [1]

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/test (glob)
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: missing file data for beta:dddc47b3ba30e54484720ce0f4f768a0f4b6efb9 - run hg verify
  [255]

  $ cd ..