tests/test-addremove-similar.t

util: teach lrucachedict to enforce a max total cost

Now that lrucachedict entries can have a numeric cost associated
with them and we can easily pop the oldest item in the cache, it
now becomes relatively trivial to implement support for enforcing
a high water mark on the total cost of items in the cache.

This commit teaches lrucachedict instances to have a max cost
associated with them. When items are inserted, we pop old items
until enough "cost" frees up to make room for the new item.

This feature is close to zero cost when not used (modulo the insertion
regressed introduced by the previous commit):

$ ./hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000
! gets
! wall 0.607444 comb 0.610000 user 0.610000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! wall 0.601653 comb 0.600000 user 0.600000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts
! wall 0.678261 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14)
! wall 0.685042 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! sets
! wall 0.808770 comb 0.800000 user 0.800000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! wall 0.834241 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12)
! mixed
! wall 0.782441 comb 0.780000 user 0.780000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! wall 0.803804 comb 0.800000 user 0.800000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000
! init
! wall 0.006952 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 418)
! gets
! wall 0.613350 comb 0.610000 user 0.610000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! wall 0.617415 comb 0.620000 user 0.620000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts
! wall 0.701270 comb 0.700000 user 0.700000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! wall 0.700516 comb 0.700000 user 0.700000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! sets
! wall 0.825720 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! wall 0.837946 comb 0.840000 user 0.830000 sys 0.010000 (best of 12)
! mixed
! wall 0.821644 comb 0.820000 user 0.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! wall 0.850559 comb 0.850000 user 0.850000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12)

I reckon the slight slowdown on insert is due to added if checks.

For caches with total cost limiting enabled:

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 100
! gets w/ cost limit
! wall 0.598737 comb 0.590000 user 0.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 1.694282 comb 1.700000 user 1.700000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 1.157655 comb 1.150000 user 1.150000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000
! gets w/ cost limit
! wall 0.598526 comb 0.600000 user 0.600000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 37.838315 comb 37.840000 user 37.840000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 18.060198 comb 18.060000 user 18.060000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)

$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 --mixedgetfreq 90
! gets w/ cost limit
! wall 0.600024 comb 0.600000 user 0.600000 sys 0.000000 (best of 17)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 37.154547 comb 37.120000 user 37.120000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 4.381602 comb 4.380000 user 4.370000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3)

The functions we're benchmarking are slightly different, which could
move numbers by a few milliseconds. But the slowdown on insert is too
great to be explained by that. The slowness is due to insert heavy
operations needing to call popoldest() repeatedly when the cache is
at capacity. The next commit will address this.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4503

  $ hg init rep; cd rep

  $ touch empty-file
  $ $PYTHON -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file

  $ hg addremove
  adding empty-file
  adding large-file

  $ hg commit -m A

  $ rm large-file empty-file
  $ $PYTHON -c 'for x in range(10,10000): print(x)' > another-file

  $ hg addremove -s50
  adding another-file
  removing empty-file
  removing large-file
  recording removal of large-file as rename to another-file (99% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

comparing two empty files caused ZeroDivisionError in the past

  $ hg update -C 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm empty-file
  $ touch another-empty-file
  $ hg addremove -s50
  adding another-empty-file
  removing empty-file

  $ cd ..

  $ hg init rep2; cd rep2

  $ $PYTHON -c 'for x in range(10000): print(x)' > large-file
  $ $PYTHON -c 'for x in range(50): print(x)' > tiny-file

  $ hg addremove
  adding large-file
  adding tiny-file

  $ hg commit -m A

  $ $PYTHON -c 'for x in range(70): print(x)' > small-file
  $ rm tiny-file
  $ rm large-file

  $ hg addremove -s50
  removing large-file
  adding small-file
  removing tiny-file
  recording removal of tiny-file as rename to small-file (82% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

should be sorted by path for stable result

  $ for i in `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     cp small-file $i
  > done
  $ rm small-file
  $ hg addremove
  adding 0
  adding 1
  adding 2
  adding 3
  adding 4
  adding 5
  adding 6
  adding 7
  adding 8
  adding 9
  removing small-file
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 0 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 1 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 2 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 3 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 4 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 5 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 6 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 7 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 8 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 9 (100% similar)
  $ hg commit -m '10 same files'

pick one from many identical files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ rm `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 0 as rename to a (100% similar)
  $ hg revert -aq

pick one from many similar files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ for i in `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     echo $i >> $i
  > done
  $ hg commit -m 'make them slightly different'
  $ rm `$PYTHON $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove -s50
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 0 as rename to a (99% similar)
  $ hg commit -m 'always the same file should be selected'

should all fail

  $ hg addremove -s foo
  abort: similarity must be a number
  [255]
  $ hg addremove -s -1
  abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100
  [255]
  $ hg addremove -s 1e6
  abort: similarity must be between 0 and 100
  [255]

  $ cd ..

Issue1527: repeated addremove causes Abort

  $ hg init rep3; cd rep3
  $ mkdir d
  $ echo a > d/a
  $ hg add d/a
  $ hg commit -m 1

  $ mv d/a d/b
  $ hg addremove -s80
  removing d/a
  adding d/b
  recording removal of d/a as rename to d/b (100% similar)
  $ hg debugstate
  r   0          0 1970-01-01 00:00:00 d/a
  a   0         -1 unset               d/b
  copy: d/a -> d/b
  $ mv d/b c

no copies found here (since the target isn't in d

  $ hg addremove -s80 d
  removing d/b

copies here

  $ hg addremove -s80
  adding c
  recording removal of d/a as rename to c (100% similar)

  $ cd ..