annotate tests/test-ancestor.py.out @ 51871:cfd30df0f8e4

bundlerepo: fix mismatches with repository and revlog classes

Both pytype and PyCharm complained that `write()` and `_write()` in the
bundlephasecache class aren't proper overrides- indeed they seem to be missing
an argument that the base class has.

PyCharm and pytype also complained that the `revlog.revlog` class doesn't have a
`_chunk()` method.  That looks like it was moved from revlog to `_InnerRevlog`
back in e8ad6d8de8b8, and wasn't caught because this module wasn't type checked.
However, I couldn't figure out a syntax with `revlog.revlog._inner._chunk(self, rev)`,
as it complained about passing too many args.  `bundlerevlog._rawtext()` uses
this `super(...)` style to call the super class, so hopefully that works, even
with the wonky dynamic subclassing.  The revlog class needed the `_InnerRevlog`
field typed because it isn't set in the constructor.

Finally, the vfs type hints look broken.  This initially failed with:

    File "/mnt/c/Users/Matt/hg/mercurial/bundlerepo.py", line 65, in __init__: Function readonlyvfs.__init__ was called with the wrong arguments [wrong-arg-types]
             Expected: (self, vfs: mercurial.vfs.vfs)
      Actually passed: (self, vfs: Callable)
    Called from (traceback):
      line 232, in dirlog
      line 214, in __init__

I don't see a raw Callable, but I tried changing some of the vfs args to be typed
as `vfsmod.abstractvfs`, but that class doesn't have `options`, so it failed
elsewhere.  `readonlyvfs` isn't a subclass of `vfs` (it's a subclass of
`abstractvfs`), so I'm not sure how to handle that.  It would be a shame to have
to make a union of vfs subclasses (but not all of them have `options` either).

% removeancestorsfrom(), example 1
remaining (sorted): [5, 6, 8, 9]
% removeancestorsfrom(), example 2
remaining (sorted): [11, 12, 13, 14]
% removeancestorsfrom(), example 3
remaining (sorted): [3, 5]
% missingancestors(), example 1
return [3, 7, 11]
% missingancestors(), example 2
return [5, 10]
% missingancestors(), example 3
return [3, 6, 9, 11]
% removeancestorsfrom(), bigger graph
Ok
% lazy ancestor set for [], stoprev = 0, inclusive = False
membership: []
iteration:  []
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 0, inclusive = False
membership: [7, 8, 3, 4, 1, 0]
iteration:  [8, 7, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]
% lazy ancestor set for [1, 3], stoprev = 0, inclusive = False
membership: [1, 0]
iteration:  [1, 0]
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 0, inclusive = True
membership: [11, 13, 7, 8, 3, 4, 1, 0]
iteration:  [13, 11, 8, 7, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 6, inclusive = False
membership: [7, 8]
iteration:  [8, 7]
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 6, inclusive = True
membership: [11, 13, 7, 8]
iteration:  [13, 11, 8, 7]
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 11, inclusive = True
membership: [11, 13]
iteration:  [13, 11]
% lazy ancestor set for [11, 13], stoprev = 12, inclusive = True
membership: [13]
iteration:  [13]
% lazy ancestor set for [10, 1], stoprev = 0, inclusive = True
membership: [2, 10, 4, 5, 0, 1]
iteration:  [10, 5, 4, 2, 1, 0]