annotate tests/test-issue522.t @ 26631:e077ce385609

localrepo: restore dirstate to one before rollbacking if not parent-gone

'localrepository.rollback()' explicilty restores dirstate, only if at
least one of current parents of the working directory is removed at
rollbacking (a.k.a "parent-gone").

After DirstateTransactionPlan, 'dirstate.write()' will cause marking
'.hg/dirstate' as a file to be restored at rollbacking.

    https://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/DirstateTransactionPlan

Then, 'transaction.rollback()' restores '.hg/dirstate' regardless of
parents of the working directory at that time, and this causes
unexpected dirstate changes if not "parent-gone" (e.g.  "hg update" to
another branch after "hg commit" or so, then "hg rollback").

To avoid such situation, this patch restores dirstate to one before
rollbacking if not "parent-gone".

  before:
    b1. restore dirstate explicitly, if "parent-gone"

  after:
    a1. save dirstate before actual rollbacking via dirstateguard
    a2. restore dirstate via 'transaction.rollback()'
    a3. if "parent-gone"
        - discard backup (a1)
        - restore dirstate from 'undo.dirstate'
    a4. otherwise, restore dirstate from backup (a1)

Even though restoring dirstate at (a3) after (a2) seems redundant,
this patch keeps this existing code path, because:

  - it isn't ensured that 'dirstate.write()' was invoked at least once
    while transaction running

    If not, '.hg/dirstate' isn't restored at (a2).

    In addition to it, rude 3rd party extension invoking
    'dirstate.write()' without 'repo' while transaction running (see
    subsequent patches for detail) may break consistency of a file
    backup-ed by transaction.

  - this patch mainly focuses on changes for DirstateTransactionPlan

    Restoring dirstate at (a3) itself should be cheaper enough than
    rollbacking itself. Redundancy will be removed in next step.

Newly added test is almost meaningless at this point. It will be used
to detect regression while implementing delayed dirstate write out.

https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/522

In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'

  $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
  reverting foo
  changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ touch bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     bar
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
   foo: remote is newer -> g
  getting foo
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate | grep foo
  m   0         -2 unset               foo

  $ hg st -A foo
  M foo

  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

  $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
  c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644   foo

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         5       9  .....       1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
       2        14       5  .....       2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)