annotate tests/test-issue3084.t @ 39018:e793e11e1462

changegroup: introduce requests to define delta generation

Currently, we iterate through each revision we will be producing
a delta for then call into 1 of 2 functions for generating that
delta. Deltas are emitted as we iterate.

A problem with this model is that revision generation is tightly
coupled to the changegroup code. And the storage layer needs to
expose APIs like deltaparent() so changegroup delta generation
can produce a delta with that knowledge.

Another problem is that in this model, deltas can only be produced
sequentially after the previous delta was produced and emitted.
Some storage backends might be capable of producing deltas in
parallel (e.g. if the changegroup deltas are cached somewhere).

This commit aims to solve these problems by turning delta generation
into a 2 phase implementation where the first phase determines
info about all the deltas that need to be generated and the 2nd
phase resolves those deltas.

We introduce a "revisiondeltarequest" object that holds data about
a to-be-generated delta. We perform a full pass over all revisions
whose delta is to be generated and generate a "revisiondeltarequest"
for each. Then we iterate over the "revisiondeltarequest" instances
and derive a "revisiondelta" for each.

This patch was quite large. In order to avoid even more churn, aspects
of the implementation are less than ideal. e.g. we're recording
revision numbers instead of nodes in a few places and we don't
yet have a formal API for resolving an iterable of revisiondeltarequest
instances. Things will be improved in subsequent commits.

Unfortunately, this commit reduces performance substantially. For
`hg perfchangegroupchangelog` on my hg repo:

! wall 1.512607 comb 1.510000 user 1.490000 sys 0.020000 (best of 7)
! wall 2.150863 comb 2.150000 user 2.150000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5)

And for `hg bundle -t none-v2 -a` for the mozilla-unified repo:

178.32user 4.22system 3:02.59elapsed
190.97user 4.17system 3:15.19elapsed

Some of this was attributed to changelog slowdown. `hg
perfchangegroupchangelog` on mozilla-unified:

! wall 21.688715 comb 21.690000 user 21.570000 sys 0.120000 (best of 3)
! wall 25.683659 comb 25.680000 user 25.540000 sys 0.140000 (best of 3)

Profiling seems to reveal that the changelog slowdown is due to reading
changelog revisions multiple times. First in the linknode callback
to resolve the set of files changed. Second in the delta generation.
Before, we likely had hit the last revision cache in the revlog when
doing delta generation since we performed that immediately after
performing the linknode callback.

I'm not exactly sure where the other ~8s are being spent. It might be
from overhead of constructing a few million revisiondeltarequest
objects. I'm OK with the regression for now because it is in service
of a larger cause (storage abstraction). I'll try to profile later
and claw back the performance.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4215

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "largefiles =" >> $HGRCPATH

Create the repository outside $HOME since largefiles write to
$HOME/.cache/largefiles.

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo "root" > root
  $ hg add root
  $ hg commit -m "Root commit" --config extensions.largefiles=!

Ensure that .hg/largefiles isn't created before largefiles are added
#if unix-permissions
  $ chmod 555 .hg
#endif
  $ hg status
#if unix-permissions
  $ chmod 755 .hg
#endif

  $ test -f .hg/largefiles
  [1]

  $ echo "large" > foo
  $ hg add --large foo
  $ hg commit -m "Add foo as a largefile"

  $ hg update -r 0
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 1 removed
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo "normal" > foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ hg commit -m "Add foo as normal file"
  created new head

Normal file in the working copy, keeping the normal version:

  $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  $ cat foo
  normal

Normal file in the working copy, keeping the largefile version:

  $ hg update -q -C
  $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  M foo

  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 .hglf/foo
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/.hglf/foo
  @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  +7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18
  diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 foo
  --- a/foo
  +++ /dev/null
  @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@
  -normal

  $ cat foo
  large

Largefile in the working copy, keeping the normal version:

  $ hg update -q -C -r 1
  $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  M foo

  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r ff521236428a .hglf/foo
  --- a/.hglf/foo
  +++ /dev/null
  @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@
  -7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18
  diff -r ff521236428a foo
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/foo
  @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  +normal

  $ cat foo
  normal

Largefile in the working copy, keeping the largefile version:

  $ hg update -q -C -r 1
  $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status

  $ cat foo
  large

Whatever ... commit something so we can invoke merge when updating

  $ hg commit -m '3: Merge'

Updating from largefile to normal - no reason to prompt

  $ hg up -r 2
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cat foo
  normal

(the update above used to leave the working dir in a very weird state - clean it
  $ hg up -qr null
  $ hg up -qr 2
)

Updating from normal to largefile - no reason to prompt

  $ hg up -r 3
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cat foo
  large

  $ cd ..


Systematic testing of merges involving largefiles:

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-id  Parent: large   result: large
Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal2    Parent: large   result: ?
Ancestor: large   Parent: large-id   Parent: normal  result: normal
Ancestor: large   Parent: large2     Parent: normal  result: ?

All cases should try merging both ways.

Prepare test repo:

  $ hg init merges
  $ cd merges

prepare cases with "normal" ancestor:

  $ hg up -qr null
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-ancestor"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-ancestor"
  $ touch f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-id"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-id"
  $ echo normal2 > f
  $ hg ci -m "normal2"
  $ hg tag -l "normal2"
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-same"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-same"
  $ hg up -qr "normal-ancestor"
  $ hg rm f
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg add --large f
  $ hg ci -qm "large"
  $ hg tag -l "large"

prepare cases with "large" ancestor:

  $ hg up -qr null
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg add --large f
  $ hg ci -qm "large-ancestor"
  $ hg tag -l "large-ancestor"
  $ touch f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm "large-id"
  $ hg tag -l "large-id"
  $ echo large2 > f
  $ hg ci -m "large2"
  $ hg tag -l "large2"
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "large-same"
  $ hg tag -l "large-same"
  $ hg up -qr "large-ancestor"
  $ hg rm f
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -qAm "normal"
  $ hg tag -l "normal"

  $ hg log -GT '{tags}'
  @  normal tip
  |
  | o  large-same
  | |
  | o  large2
  | |
  | o  large-id
  |/
  o  large-ancestor
  
  o  large
  |
  | o  normal-same
  | |
  | o  normal2
  | |
  | o  normal-id
  |/
  o  normal-ancestor
  


Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-id  Parent: large   result: large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal-id
  $ hg merge -r large
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal-id
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-same  Parent: large   result: large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal-same
  $ hg merge -r large
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal-same
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal2  Parent: large   result: ?
(annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm)

  $ hg up -Cqr normal2
  $ hg merge -r large
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal2
  $ echo n | hg merge -r large --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal2

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal2
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ echo n | hg merge -r normal2 --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal2

Ancestor: large   Parent: large-id   Parent: normal  result: normal

  $ hg up -Cqr large-id
  $ hg merge -r normal
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large-id
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

Ancestor: large   Parent: large-same   Parent: normal  result: normal

  $ hg up -Cqr large-same
  $ hg merge -r normal
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large-same
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

Ancestor: large   Parent: large2   Parent: normal  result: ?
(annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm)

  $ hg up -Cqr large2
  $ hg merge -r normal
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large2

  $ hg up -Cqr large2
  $ echo n | hg merge -r normal --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large2
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large2

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ echo n | hg merge -r large2 --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

  $ cd ..