tests/test-push-checkheads-pruned-B7.t

repository: define new interface for running commands

Today, the peer interface exposes methods for each command that can
be executed. In addition, there is an iterbatch() API that allows
commands to be issued in batches and provides an iterator over the
results. This is a glorified wrapper around the "batch" wire command.

Wire protocol version 2 supports nicer things (such as batching
any command and out-of-order replies). It will require a more
flexible API for executing commands.

This commit introduces a new peer interface for making command
requests. In the new world, you can't simply call a method on the
peer to execute a command: you need to obtain an object to be used
for executing commands. That object can be used to issue a single
command or it can batch multiple requests. In the case of full duplex
peers, the command may even be sent out over the wire immediately.

There are no per-command methods. Instead, there is a generic
method to call a command. The implementation can then perform domain
specific processing for specific commands. This includes passing
data via a specially named argument.

Arguments are also passed as a dictionary instead of using **kwargs.
While **kwargs is nicer to use, we've historically gotten into
trouble using it because there will inevitably be a conflict between
the name of an argument to a wire protocol command and an argument
we want to pass into a function.

Instead of a command returning a value, it returns a future which
will resolve to a value. This opens the door for out-of-order
response handling and concurrent response handling in the version
2 protocol.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3267

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case B-7
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category B: simple case involving pruned changesets
TestCase 7: single changesets, pruned then superseeded (on an existing changeset)

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old branch is rewritten onto the common set,
.. * the new version is then pruned.
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠⊗ A'
.. B ◔ | |
..    \|/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir B7
  $ cd B7
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ mkcommit A1
  $ hg up 'desc(B0)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)"` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(A1)"`
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  ba93660aff8d (draft): A1
  |
  @  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/B7/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  2 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..