comparison tests/test-addremove-similar.t @ 31579:3a383caa97f4

similar: sort files not by object id but by path for stable result

Perhaps the original implementation would want to sort added/removed files
alphabetically, but actually it did sort fctx objects by memory location.

This patch removes the use of set()s in order to preserve the order of
added/removed files. addedfiles.remove() becomes quadratic, but its cost
appears not dominant. Anyway, the quadratic behavior will be eliminated by
the next patch.

Benchmark with 50k added/removed files, on tmpfs:

  $ mkdir src
  $ for n in `seq 0 49`; do
  >     mkdir `printf src/%02d $n`
  > done

  $ for n in `seq 0 49999`; do
  >     f=`printf src/%02d/%05d $(($n/1000)) $n`
  >     dd if=/dev/urandom of=$f bs=8k count=1 status=none
  > done

  $ hg ci -qAm 'add 50k files of random content'
  $ mv src dest

  $ hg addremove --dry-run --time -q

  original:   real 16.550 secs (user 15.000+0.000 sys 1.540+0.000)
  this patch: real 16.730 secs (user 15.280+0.000 sys 1.440+0.000)

31578:6262e30b0c09

  removing tiny-file
  recording removal of tiny-file as rename to small-file (82% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

should all fail

  $ hg addremove -s foo
  abort: similarity must be a number
  [255]

31579:3a383caa97f4

  removing tiny-file
  recording removal of tiny-file as rename to small-file (82% similar)

  $ hg commit -m B

should be sorted by path for stable result

  $ for i in `python $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     cp small-file $i
  > done
  $ rm small-file
  $ hg addremove
  adding 0
  adding 1
  adding 2
  adding 3
  adding 4
  adding 5
  adding 6
  adding 7
  adding 8
  adding 9
  removing small-file
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 0 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 1 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 2 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 3 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 4 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 5 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 6 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 7 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 8 (100% similar)
  recording removal of small-file as rename to 9 (100% similar)
  $ hg commit -m '10 same files'

pick one from many identical files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ rm `python $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 9 as rename to a (100% similar)
  $ hg revert -aq

pick one from many similar files

  $ cp 0 a
  $ for i in `python $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`; do
  >     echo $i >> $i
  > done
  $ hg commit -m 'make them slightly different'
  $ rm `python $TESTDIR/seq.py 0 9`
  $ hg addremove -s50
  removing 0
  removing 1
  removing 2
  removing 3
  removing 4
  removing 5
  removing 6
  removing 7
  removing 8
  removing 9
  adding a
  recording removal of 9 as rename to a (99% similar)
  $ hg commit -m 'always the same file should be selected'

should all fail

  $ hg addremove -s foo
  abort: similarity must be a number
  [255]