diff mercurial/merge.py @ 27316:777f668eca70

merge: refuse update/merge if there are unresolved conflicts (BC) We currently allow updating and merging (with --force) when there are unresolved merge conflicts, as long as there is only one parent of the working copy. Even worse, when updating to another revision (linearly), if one of the unresolved files (including any conflict markers in the working copy) can now be merged cleanly with the target revision, the file becomes marked as resolved. While we could potentially allow updates that affect only files that are not in the set of unresolved files, that's considerably more work, and we don't have a use case for it anyway. Instead, let's keep it simple and refuse any merge or update (without -C) when there are unresolved conflicts. Note that test-merge-local.t explicitly checks for conflict markers that get carried over on update. It's unclear if that was intentional or not, but it seems bad enough that we should forbid it. The simplest way of fixing the test case is to leave the conflict markers in place and just mark the files resolved, so let's just do that for now.
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
date Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:43:24 -0800
parents d6859d86a5d5
children 43c00ca887d1
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/mercurial/merge.py	Tue Dec 08 07:05:37 2015 +0000
+++ b/mercurial/merge.py	Mon Dec 07 20:43:24 2015 -0800
@@ -1341,8 +1341,12 @@
         fp1, fp2, xp1, xp2 = p1.node(), p2.node(), str(p1), str(p2)
 
         ### check phase
-        if not overwrite and len(pl) > 1:
-            raise error.Abort(_("outstanding uncommitted merge"))
+        if not overwrite:
+            if len(pl) > 1:
+                raise error.Abort(_("outstanding uncommitted merge"))
+            ms = mergestate.read(repo)
+            if list(ms.unresolved()):
+                raise error.Abort(_("outstanding merge conflicts"))
         if branchmerge:
             if pas == [p2]:
                 raise error.Abort(_("merging with a working directory ancestor"