transaction: support cache file in backupentries
We do not want to abort if anything wrong happen while handling a cache file.
Cache file have way to be invalidated and if old/bad version stay no
misbehavior will happen. Proper value will eventually be computed and the wrong
will be righten.
This changeset use the transaction reporter (usually writing on stderr) to write
details about failed cache handling. This will only apply to write operation
using a transaction. The usual update during read only operation will stay a
debug message.
I was on the way to bring these message back to debug level when I realised it
could be a feature. People with write access to the repository are likely to
have the power to fix error related to cache (and it is valuable to fix them).
So let the things as is for now.
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
> import sys
> print 'Using custom patch'
> if '--binary' in sys.argv:
> print '--binary found !'
> EOF
$ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a > a
$ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
$ cd ..
This test checks that:
- custom patch commands with arguments actually work
- patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
--binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
--binary is added by default under win32.
check custom patch options are honored
$ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
$ hg clone -r 0 a b
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
applying ../a.diff
Using custom patch
applied to working directory
Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description
Prepare source repo and patch:
$ rm $HGRCPATH
$ hg init c
$ cd c
$ printf "a\rc" > a
$ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
$ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
$ cat << eof > log
> first line which can't start with '# '
> # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
> A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
> eof
$ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
$ hg export -o p 1
$ cd ..
Clone and apply patch:
$ hg clone -r 0 c d
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd d
$ hg import ../c/p
applying ../c/p
$ hg log -v -r 1
changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: a
description:
first line which can't start with '# '
# second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
# HG changeset patch
# User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
$ cd ..