view tests/test-arbitraryfilectx.t @ 41163:0101a35deae2

phabricator: warn if unable to amend, instead of aborting after posting

There was a divergence in behavior here between obsolete and strip based
amending.  I first noticed the abort when testing outside of the test harness,
but then had trouble recreating it here after reverting the code changes.  It
turns out, strip based amend was successfully amending the public commit after
it was posted!  It looks like the protection is in the `commit --amend` command,
not in the underlying code that it calls.

I considered doing a preflight check and aborting.  But the locks are only
acquired at the end, if amending, and this is too large a section of code to be
wrapped in a maybe-it's-held-or-not context manager for my tastes.
Additionally, some people do post-push reviews, and amending is the default
behavior, so they shouldn't see a misleading error message.

The lack of a 'Differential Revision' entry in the commit message breaks a
{phabreview} test, so it had to be partially conditionalized.

Setup:
  $ cat > eval.py <<EOF
  > from __future__ import absolute_import
  > import filecmp
  > from mercurial import commands, context, pycompat, registrar
  > cmdtable = {}
  > command = registrar.command(cmdtable)
  > @command(b'eval', [], b'hg eval CMD')
  > def eval_(ui, repo, *cmds, **opts):
  >     cmd = b" ".join(cmds)
  >     res = pycompat.bytestr(eval(cmd, globals(), locals()))
  >     ui.warn(b"%s" % res)
  > EOF

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "eval=`pwd`/eval.py" >> $HGRCPATH

Arbitraryfilectx.cmp does not follow symlinks:
  $ mkdir case1
  $ cd case1
  $ hg init
#if symlink
  $ printf "A" > real_A
  $ printf "foo" > A
  $ printf "foo" > B
  $ ln -s A sym_A
  $ hg add .
  adding A
  adding B
  adding real_A
  adding sym_A
  $ hg commit -m "base"
#else
  $ hg import -q --bypass - <<EOF
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User test
  > # Date 0 0
  > base
  > 
  > diff --git a/A b/A
  > new file mode 100644
  > --- /dev/null
  > +++ b/A
  > @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  > +foo
  > \ No newline at end of file
  > diff --git a/B b/B
  > new file mode 100644
  > --- /dev/null
  > +++ b/B
  > @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  > +foo
  > \ No newline at end of file
  > diff --git a/real_A b/real_A
  > new file mode 100644
  > --- /dev/null
  > +++ b/real_A
  > @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  > +A
  > \ No newline at end of file
  > diff --git a/sym_A b/sym_A
  > new file mode 120000
  > --- /dev/null
  > +++ b/sym_A
  > @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  > +A
  > \ No newline at end of file
  > EOF
  $ hg up -q
#endif

These files are different and should return True (different):
(Note that filecmp.cmp's return semantics are inverted from ours, so we invert
for simplicity):
  $ hg eval "context.arbitraryfilectx('A', repo).cmp(repo[None]['real_A'])"
  True (no-eol)
  $ hg eval "not filecmp.cmp('A', 'real_A')"
  True (no-eol)

These files are identical and should return False (same):
  $ hg eval "context.arbitraryfilectx('A', repo).cmp(repo[None]['A'])"
  False (no-eol)
  $ hg eval "context.arbitraryfilectx('A', repo).cmp(repo[None]['B'])"
  False (no-eol)
  $ hg eval "not filecmp.cmp('A', 'B')"
  False (no-eol)

This comparison should also return False, since A and sym_A are substantially
the same in the eyes of ``filectx.cmp``, which looks at data only.
  $ hg eval "context.arbitraryfilectx('real_A', repo).cmp(repo[None]['sym_A'])"
  False (no-eol)

A naive use of filecmp on those two would wrongly return True, since it follows
the symlink to "A", which has different contents.
#if symlink
  $ hg eval "not filecmp.cmp('real_A', 'sym_A')"
  True (no-eol)
#else
  $ hg eval "not filecmp.cmp('real_A', 'sym_A')"
  False (no-eol)
#endif