view tests/test-merge-remove.t @ 41163:0101a35deae2

phabricator: warn if unable to amend, instead of aborting after posting

There was a divergence in behavior here between obsolete and strip based
amending.  I first noticed the abort when testing outside of the test harness,
but then had trouble recreating it here after reverting the code changes.  It
turns out, strip based amend was successfully amending the public commit after
it was posted!  It looks like the protection is in the `commit --amend` command,
not in the underlying code that it calls.

I considered doing a preflight check and aborting.  But the locks are only
acquired at the end, if amending, and this is too large a section of code to be
wrapped in a maybe-it's-held-or-not context manager for my tastes.
Additionally, some people do post-push reviews, and amending is the default
behavior, so they shouldn't see a misleading error message.

The lack of a 'Differential Revision' entry in the commit message breaks a
{phabreview} test, so it had to be partially conditionalized.

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar'

  $ echo foo2 >> foo
  $ echo bleh > bar
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo bar'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg mv foo foo1
  $ echo foo1 > foo1
  $ hg cat foo >> foo1
  $ hg ci -m 'mv foo foo1'
  created new head

  $ hg merge
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  m   0         -2 unset               bar
  m   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -q
  M bar
  M foo1


Removing foo1 and bar:

  $ cp foo1 F
  $ cp bar B
  $ hg rm -f foo1 bar

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  r   0         -1 set                 bar
  r   0         -1 set                 foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  R bar
  R foo1


Re-adding foo1 and bar:

  $ cp F foo1
  $ cp B bar
  $ hg add -v foo1 bar
  adding bar
  adding foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo


Reverting foo1 and bar:

  $ hg revert -vr . foo1 bar
  saving current version of bar as bar.orig
  saving current version of foo1 as foo1.orig
  reverting bar
  reverting foo1

  $ hg debugstate --no-dates
  n   0         -2 unset               bar
  n   0         -2 unset               foo1
  copy: foo -> foo1

  $ hg st -qC
  M bar
  M foo1
    foo

  $ hg diff

Merge should not overwrite local file that is untracked after remove

  $ rm *
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg rm bar
  $ hg ci -m 'remove bar'
  $ echo 'memories of buried pirate treasure' > bar
  $ hg merge
  bar: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat bar
  memories of buried pirate treasure

Those who use force will lose

  $ hg merge -f
  file 'bar' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [merge rev].
  What do you want to do?
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? u
  merging foo1 and foo to foo1
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ cat bar
  bleh
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M foo1