view tests/test-gpg.t @ 20216:01bdccfeb9d9

discovery: prefer loop to double-for list comprehension in changegroupsubset

The double-for form of list comprehensions gets particularly unreadable
when you throw in an 'if' condition. This expands the only remaining
instance of the double-for syntax in our codebase into a loop.

Test the GPG extension

  $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" gpg || exit 80
  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [extensions]
  > gpg=
  > 
  > [gpg]
  > cmd=gpg --no-permission-warning --no-secmem-warning --no-auto-check-trustdb --homedir "$TESTDIR/gpg"
  > EOF
  $ hg init r
  $ cd r
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -Amfoo
  adding foo

  $ hg sigs

  $ hg sign 0
  signing 0:e63c23eaa88a

  $ hg sigs
  hgtest                             0:e63c23eaa88ae77967edcf4ea194d31167c478b0

  $ hg sigcheck 0
  e63c23eaa88a is signed by:
   hgtest

verify that this test has not modified the trustdb.gpg file back in
the main hg working dir
  $ "$TESTDIR/md5sum.py" "$TESTDIR/gpg/trustdb.gpg"
  f6b9c78c65fa9536e7512bb2ceb338ae  */gpg/trustdb.gpg (glob)

  $ cd ..