run-tests: collect aggregate code coverage
Before this patch, every Python process during a code coverage run was
writing coverage data to the same file. I'm not sure if the coverage
package even tries to obtain a lock on the file. But what I do know is
there was some last write wins leading to loss of code coverage data, at
least with -j > 1.
This patch changes the code coverage mechanism to be multiple process
safe. The mechanism for initializing code coverage via sitecustomize.py
has been tweaked so each Python process will produce a separate coverage
data file on disk. Unless two processes generate the same random value,
there are no race conditions writing to the same file. At the end of the
test run, we combine all written files into an aggregate report.
On my machine, running the full test suite produces a little over
20,000 coverage files consuming ~350 MB. As you can imagine, it takes
several seconds to load and merge these coverage files. But when it is
done, you have an accurate picture of the aggregate code coverage for the
entire test suite, which is ~60% line coverage.
Revert interactive tests
1 add and commit file f
2 add commit file folder1/g
3 add and commit file folder2/h
4 add and commit file folder1/i
5 commit change to file f
6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and
9 make workdir match 7
10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations
$ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
> [ui]
> interactive = true
> [extensions]
> record =
> EOF
$ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2
$ cd a
$ hg init
>>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n")
$ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f"
$ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g"
$ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h"
$ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i"
>>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying f"
>>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g"
>>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n")
$ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h"
$ hg tip
changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: modifying folder2/h
$ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
> y
> y
> y
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
reverting f
reverting folder1/g (glob)
removing folder1/i (glob)
reverting folder2/h (glob)
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-b
record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-c
1
2
3
4
5
record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-d
record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ cat f
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat folder1/g
1
2
3
4
5
d
$ cat folder2/h
e
1
2
3
4
5
f
$ hg update -C 6
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
> y
> y
> y
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
reverting f
reverting folder1/g (glob)
removing folder1/i (glob)
reverting folder2/h (glob)
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-b
record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
-c
1
2
3
4
5
record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
1
2
3
4
5
-d
record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ cat f
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat folder1/g
1
2
3
4
5
d
$ cat folder2/h
e
1
2
3
4
5
f
$ hg st
M f
M folder1/g
R folder1/i
$ hg revert --interactive f << EOF
> y
> y
> n
> n
> EOF
diff -r 59dd6e4ab63a f
2 hunks, 2 lines changed
examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+a
1
2
3
4
5
record change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
@@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
1
2
3
4
5
+b
record change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
$ hg st
M f
M folder1/g
R folder1/i
? f.orig
$ cat f
a
1
2
3
4
5
$ cat f.orig
1
2
3
4
5