revert: handle subrepos missing in the given --rev
The list of subrepos to revert is currently based on the given --rev, so there
is currently no way for this to fail. Using the --rev context is wrong though,
because if the subrepo doesn't exist in --rev, it is skipped, so it won't be
changed. This change makes it so that the revert aborts, which is what happens
if a plain file is reverted to -1. Finding matches based on --rev is also
inconsistent with evaluating files against the working directory (
5b85a5bc5bbb).
This change is made now, so as to not cause breakage when the context is
switched in an upcoming patch.
$ hg init base
$ cd base
$ echo 'alpha' > alpha
$ hg ci -A -m 'add alpha'
adding alpha
$ cd ..
$ hg clone base work
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd work
$ echo 'beta' > beta
$ hg ci -A -m 'add beta'
adding beta
$ cd ..
$ cd base
$ echo 'gamma' > gamma
$ hg ci -A -m 'add gamma'
adding gamma
$ cd ..
$ cd work
$ hg pull -q
$ hg merge
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
Update --clean to revision 1 to simulate a failed merge:
$ rm alpha beta gamma
$ hg update --clean 1
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ..