view mercurial/treediscovery.py @ 39559:07b58266bce3

wireprotov2: implement commands as a generator of objects

Previously, wire protocol version 2 inherited version 1's model of
having separate types to represent the results of different wire
protocol commands.

As I implemented more powerful commands in future commits, I found
I was using a common pattern of returning a special type to hold a
generator. This meant the command function required a closure to
do most of the work. That made logic flow more difficult to follow.
I also noticed that many commands were effectively a sequence of
objects to be CBOR encoded.

I think it makes sense to define version 2 commands as generators.
This way, commands can simply emit the data structures they wish to
send to the client. This eliminates the need for a closure in
command functions and removes encoding from the bodies of commands.

As part of this commit, the handling of response objects has been
moved into the serverreactor class. This puts the reactor in the
driver's seat with regards to CBOR encoding and error handling.
Having error handling in the function that emits frames is
particularly important because exceptions in that function can lead
to things getting in a bad state: I'm fairly certain that uncaught
exceptions in the frame generator were causing deadlocks.

I also introduced a dedicated error type for explicit error reporting
in command handlers. This will be used in subsequent commits.

There's still a bit of work to be done here, especially around
formalizing the error handling "protocol." I've added yet another
TODO to track this so we don't forget.

Test output changed because we're using generators and no longer know
we are at the end of the data until we hit the end of the generator.
This means we can't emit the end-of-stream flag until we've exhausted
the generator. Hence the introduction of 0-sized end-of-stream frames.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4472

# discovery.py - protocol changeset discovery functions
#
# Copyright 2010 Matt Mackall <[e-mail]>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import

import collections

from .i18n import _
from .node import (
    nullid,
    short,
)
from . import (
    error,
    pycompat,
)

def findcommonincoming(repo, remote, heads=None, force=False):
    """Return a tuple (common, fetch, heads) used to identify the common
    subset of nodes between repo and remote.

    "common" is a list of (at least) the heads of the common subset.
    "fetch" is a list of roots of the nodes that would be incoming, to be
      supplied to changegroupsubset.
    "heads" is either the supplied heads, or else the remote's heads.
    """

    knownnode = repo.changelog.hasnode
    search = []
    fetch = set()
    seen = set()
    seenbranch = set()
    base = set()

    if not heads:
        with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
            heads = e.callcommand('heads', {}).result()

    if repo.changelog.tip() == nullid:
        base.add(nullid)
        if heads != [nullid]:
            return [nullid], [nullid], list(heads)
        return [nullid], [], heads

    # assume we're closer to the tip than the root
    # and start by examining the heads
    repo.ui.status(_("searching for changes\n"))

    unknown = []
    for h in heads:
        if not knownnode(h):
            unknown.append(h)
        else:
            base.add(h)

    if not unknown:
        return list(base), [], list(heads)

    req = set(unknown)
    reqcnt = 0
    progress = repo.ui.makeprogress(_('searching'), unit=_('queries'))

    # search through remote branches
    # a 'branch' here is a linear segment of history, with four parts:
    # head, root, first parent, second parent
    # (a branch always has two parents (or none) by definition)
    with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
        branches = e.callcommand('branches', {'nodes': unknown}).result()

    unknown = collections.deque(branches)
    while unknown:
        r = []
        while unknown:
            n = unknown.popleft()
            if n[0] in seen:
                continue

            repo.ui.debug("examining %s:%s\n"
                          % (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
            if n[0] == nullid: # found the end of the branch
                pass
            elif n in seenbranch:
                repo.ui.debug("branch already found\n")
                continue
            elif n[1] and knownnode(n[1]): # do we know the base?
                repo.ui.debug("found incomplete branch %s:%s\n"
                              % (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
                search.append(n[0:2]) # schedule branch range for scanning
                seenbranch.add(n)
            else:
                if n[1] not in seen and n[1] not in fetch:
                    if knownnode(n[2]) and knownnode(n[3]):
                        repo.ui.debug("found new changeset %s\n" %
                                      short(n[1]))
                        fetch.add(n[1]) # earliest unknown
                    for p in n[2:4]:
                        if knownnode(p):
                            base.add(p) # latest known

                for p in n[2:4]:
                    if p not in req and not knownnode(p):
                        r.append(p)
                        req.add(p)
            seen.add(n[0])

        if r:
            reqcnt += 1
            progress.increment()
            repo.ui.debug("request %d: %s\n" %
                        (reqcnt, " ".join(map(short, r))))
            for p in pycompat.xrange(0, len(r), 10):
                with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
                    branches = e.callcommand('branches', {
                        'nodes': r[p:p + 10],
                    }).result()

                for b in branches:
                    repo.ui.debug("received %s:%s\n" %
                                  (short(b[0]), short(b[1])))
                    unknown.append(b)

    # do binary search on the branches we found
    while search:
        newsearch = []
        reqcnt += 1
        progress.increment()

        with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
            between = e.callcommand('between', {'pairs': search}).result()

        for n, l in zip(search, between):
            l.append(n[1])
            p = n[0]
            f = 1
            for i in l:
                repo.ui.debug("narrowing %d:%d %s\n" % (f, len(l), short(i)))
                if knownnode(i):
                    if f <= 2:
                        repo.ui.debug("found new branch changeset %s\n" %
                                          short(p))
                        fetch.add(p)
                        base.add(i)
                    else:
                        repo.ui.debug("narrowed branch search to %s:%s\n"
                                      % (short(p), short(i)))
                        newsearch.append((p, i))
                    break
                p, f = i, f * 2
            search = newsearch

    # sanity check our fetch list
    for f in fetch:
        if knownnode(f):
            raise error.RepoError(_("already have changeset ")
                                  + short(f[:4]))

    base = list(base)
    if base == [nullid]:
        if force:
            repo.ui.warn(_("warning: repository is unrelated\n"))
        else:
            raise error.Abort(_("repository is unrelated"))

    repo.ui.debug("found new changesets starting at " +
                 " ".join([short(f) for f in fetch]) + "\n")

    progress.complete()
    repo.ui.debug("%d total queries\n" % reqcnt)

    return base, list(fetch), heads