view tests/test-merge8.t @ 17970:0b03454abae7

ancestor: faster algorithm for difference of ancestor sets One of the major reasons rebase is slow in large repositories is the computation of the detach set: the set of ancestors of the changesets to rebase not in the destination parent. This is currently done via a revset that does two walks all the way to the root of the DAG. Instead of doing that, to find ancestors of a set <revs> not in another set <common> we walk up the tree in reverse revision number order, maintaining sets of nodes visited from <revs>, <common> or both. For the common case where the sets are close both topologically and in revision number (relative to repository size), this has been found to speed up rebase by around 15-20%. When the nodes are farther apart and the DAG is highly branching, it is harder to say which would win. Here's how long computing the detach set takes in a linear repository with over 400000 changesets, rebasing near tip: Rebasing across 4 changesets Revset method: 2.2s New algorithm: 0.00015s Rebasing across 250 changesets Revset method: 2.2s New algorithm: 0.00069s Rebasing across 10000 changesets Revset method: 2.4s New algorithm: 0.019s
author Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com>
date Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:46:51 -0800
parents f2719b387380
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

Test for changeset ba7c74081861
(update dirstate correctly for non-branchmerge updates)
  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m a
  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd a
  $ hg mv a b
  $ hg commit -m move
  $ echo b >> b
  $ hg commit -m b
  $ cd ../b
  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd ..