view tests/test-changelog-exec.t @ 24588:0bf54479a9eb

json: implement {shortlog} and {changelog} templates These are the same dispatch function under the hood. The only difference is the default number of entries to render and the template to use. So it makes sense to use a shared template. Format for {changelistentry} is similar to {changeset}. However, there are differences to argument names and their values preventing us from (easily) using the same template. (Perhaps there is room to consolidate the templates as a follow-up.) We're currently not recording some data in {changelistentry} that exists in {changeset}. This includes the branch name. This should be added in a follow-up. For now, something is better than nothing.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:53:48 -0700
parents e6e7ef68c879
children 009d0283de5f
line wrap: on
line source

#require execbit

b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the
changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test
that that doesn't happen anymore

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar > bar
  $ chmod +x bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

manifest of p2:

  $ hg manifest
  bar
  foo

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

manifest of p1:

  $ hg manifest
  foo

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ chmod +x foo
  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

this should not mention bar but should mention foo:

  $ hg tip -v
  changeset:   3:c53d17ff3380
  tag:         tip
  parent:      2:ed1b79f46b9a
  parent:      1:d394a8db219b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       foo
  description:
  merge
  
  

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000 (re)

  $ cd ..