view tests/test-wireproto.py @ 24588:0bf54479a9eb

json: implement {shortlog} and {changelog} templates

These are the same dispatch function under the hood. The only difference
is the default number of entries to render and the template to use. So
it makes sense to use a shared template.

Format for {changelistentry} is similar to {changeset}. However, there
are differences to argument names and their values preventing us from
(easily) using the same template. (Perhaps there is room to consolidate
the templates as a follow-up.)

We're currently not recording some data in {changelistentry} that exists
in {changeset}. This includes the branch name. This should be added in
a follow-up. For now, something is better than nothing.

from mercurial import wireproto

class proto(object):
    def __init__(self, args):
        self.args = args
    def getargs(self, spec):
        args = self.args
        args.setdefault('*', {})
        names = spec.split()
        return [args[n] for n in names]

class clientpeer(wireproto.wirepeer):
    def __init__(self, serverrepo):
        self.serverrepo = serverrepo
    def _call(self, cmd, **args):
        return wireproto.dispatch(self.serverrepo, proto(args), cmd)

    @wireproto.batchable
    def greet(self, name):
        f = wireproto.future()
        yield {'name': mangle(name)}, f
        yield unmangle(f.value)

class serverrepo(object):
    def greet(self, name):
        return "Hello, " + name

    def filtered(self, name):
        return self

def mangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) + 1) for c in s)
def unmangle(s):
    return ''.join(chr(ord(c) - 1) for c in s)

def greet(repo, proto, name):
    return mangle(repo.greet(unmangle(name)))

wireproto.commands['greet'] = (greet, 'name',)

srv = serverrepo()
clt = clientpeer(srv)

print clt.greet("Foobar")
b = clt.batch()
fs = [b.greet(s) for s in ["Fo, =;o", "Bar"]]
b.submit()
print [f.value for f in fs]