view tests/test-eol-clone.t @ 20642:0dc7a50345c2

merge: use the right ancestor when both sides copied the same file

The tests shows no real changes because of this ... but there must be some
weird corner cases where using the right ancestor for the merge planning is
better than using the wrong one.

Testing cloning with the EOL extension

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > eol =
  > 
  > [eol]
  > native = CRLF
  > EOF

setup repository

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ cat > .hgeol <<EOF
  > [patterns]
  > **.txt = native
  > EOF
  $ printf "first\r\nsecond\r\nthird\r\n" > a.txt
  $ hg commit --addremove -m 'checkin'
  adding .hgeol
  adding a.txt

Clone

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone repo repo-2
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd repo-2
  $ cat a.txt
  first\r (esc)
  second\r (esc)
  third\r (esc)
  $ hg cat a.txt
  first
  second
  third
  $ hg remove .hgeol
  $ hg commit -m 'remove eol'
  $ hg push --quiet
  $ cd ..

Test clone of repo with .hgeol in working dir, but no .hgeol in tip

  $ hg clone repo repo-3
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd repo-3

  $ cat a.txt
  first
  second
  third

Test clone of revision with .hgeol

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone -r 0 repo repo-4
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd repo-4
  $ cat .hgeol
  [patterns]
  **.txt = native

  $ cat a.txt
  first\r (esc)
  second\r (esc)
  third\r (esc)

  $ cd ..