Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-issue1502.t @ 20642:0dc7a50345c2
merge: use the right ancestor when both sides copied the same file
The tests shows no real changes because of this ... but there must be some
weird corner cases where using the right ancestor for the merge planning is
better than using the wrong one.
author | Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:29:46 +0100 |
parents | 76df01e56e7f |
children | 2fc86d92c4a9 |
line wrap: on
line source
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue1502 Initialize repository $ hg init foo $ touch foo/a && hg -R foo commit -A -m "added a" adding a $ hg clone foo foo1 updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo "bar" > foo1/a && hg -R foo1 commit -m "edit a in foo1" $ echo "hi" > foo/a && hg -R foo commit -m "edited a foo" $ hg -R foo1 pull -u pulling from $TESTTMP/foo (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) not updating: not a linear update (merge or update --check to force update) $ hg -R foo1 book branchy $ hg -R foo1 book * branchy 1:e3e522925eff Pull. Bookmark should not jump to new head. $ echo "there" >> foo/a && hg -R foo commit -m "edited a again" $ hg -R foo1 pull pulling from $TESTTMP/foo (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (run 'hg update' to get a working copy) $ hg -R foo1 book * branchy 1:e3e522925eff