view tests/test-merge10.t @ 20642:0dc7a50345c2

merge: use the right ancestor when both sides copied the same file

The tests shows no real changes because of this ... but there must be some
weird corner cases where using the right ancestor for the merge planning is
better than using the wrong one.

Test for changeset 9fe267f77f56ff127cf7e65dc15dd9de71ce8ceb
(merge correctly when all the files in a directory are moved
but then local changes are added in the same directory)

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ mkdir -p testdir
  $ echo a > testdir/a
  $ hg add testdir/a
  $ hg commit -m a
  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd a
  $ echo alpha > testdir/a
  $ hg commit -m remote-change
  $ cd ..

  $ cd b
  $ mkdir testdir/subdir
  $ hg mv testdir/a testdir/subdir/a
  $ hg commit -m move
  $ mkdir newdir
  $ echo beta > newdir/beta
  $ hg add newdir/beta
  $ hg commit -m local-addition
  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg up -C 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  merging testdir/subdir/a and testdir/a to testdir/subdir/a
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg stat
  M testdir/subdir/a
  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r bc21c9773bfa testdir/subdir/a
  --- a/testdir/subdir/a
  +++ b/testdir/subdir/a
  @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
  -a
  +alpha

  $ cd ..