view tests/test-merge2.t @ 20642:0dc7a50345c2

merge: use the right ancestor when both sides copied the same file

The tests shows no real changes because of this ... but there must be some
weird corner cases where using the right ancestor for the merge planning is
better than using the wrong one.

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #1"
  $ rm b
  $ hg update 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo This is file b2 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #2"
  created new head
  $ cd ..; rm -r t

  $ mkdir t
  $ cd t
  $ hg init
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #1"
  $ rm b
  $ hg update 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo This is file b2 > b
  $ hg commit -A -m "commit #2"
  adding b
  created new head
  $ cd ..; rm -r t

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #1"
  $ rm b
  $ hg remove b
  $ hg update 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo This is file b2 > b
  $ hg commit -A -m "commit #2"
  adding b
  created new head

  $ cd ..