view mercurial/mpatch.h @ 31626:0febf8e4e2ce

repair: use context manager for lock management If repo.lock() raised inside of the try block, 'tr' would have been None in the finally block where it tries to release(). Modernize the syntax instead of just winching the lock out of the try block. I found several other instances of acquiring the lock inside of the 'try', but those finally blocks handle None references. I also started switching some trivial try/finally blocks to context managers, but didn't get them all because indenting over 3x for lock, wlock and transaction would have spilled over 80 characters. That got me wondering if there should be a repo.rwlock(), to handle locking and unlocking in the proper order. It also looks like py27 supports supports multiple context managers for a single 'with' statement. Should I hold off on the rest until py26 is dropped?
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
date Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:47:23 -0400
parents 155f0cc3f813
children 761355833867
line wrap: on
line source

#ifndef _HG_MPATCH_H_
#define _HG_MPATCH_H_

#define MPATCH_ERR_NO_MEM -3
#define MPATCH_ERR_CANNOT_BE_DECODED -2
#define MPATCH_ERR_INVALID_PATCH -1

struct mpatch_frag {
	int start, end, len;
	const char *data;
};

struct mpatch_flist {
	struct mpatch_frag *base, *head, *tail;
};

int mpatch_decode(const char *bin, ssize_t len, struct mpatch_flist** res);
ssize_t mpatch_calcsize(ssize_t len, struct mpatch_flist *l);
void mpatch_lfree(struct mpatch_flist *a);
int mpatch_apply(char *buf, const char *orig, ssize_t len,
	struct mpatch_flist *l);
struct mpatch_flist *mpatch_fold(void *bins,
	struct mpatch_flist* (*get_next_item)(void*, ssize_t),
	ssize_t start, ssize_t end);

#endif