view tests/test-issue4074.t @ 31015:1076f7eba964

smartset: convert set to list lazily If the caller only wants to construct a baseset via a set, and then do "__contains__" tests. It's unnecessary to initialize the list. Testing on my unfiltered hg-committed repo where len(draft()) is 2600, this patch shows about 6% improvement on set intensive queries: Before: $ for i in `seq 5`; hg perfrevset 'draft() & draft() & draft() & draft()' ! wall 0.001196 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2011) ! wall 0.001191 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2099) ! wall 0.001186 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1953) ! wall 0.001182 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2135) ! wall 0.001193 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2177) After: $ for i in `seq 5`; hg perfrevset 'draft() & draft() & draft() & draft()' ! wall 0.001128 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2247) ! wall 0.001119 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2317) ! wall 0.001115 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2244) ! wall 0.001131 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2093) ! wall 0.001124 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2134) It could have bigger impact on larger sets in theory.
author Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
date Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:59:29 -0800
parents f1ca249696ed
children 75be14993fda
line wrap: on
line source

#require no-pure

A script to generate nasty diff worst-case scenarios:

  $ cat > s.py <<EOF
  > import random
  > for x in xrange(100000):
  >     print
  >     if random.randint(0, 100) >= 50:
  >         x += 1
  >     print hex(x)
  > EOF

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

Check in a big file:

  $ python ../s.py > a
  $ hg ci -qAm0

Modify it:

  $ python ../s.py > a

Time a check-in, should never take more than 10 seconds user time:

  $ hg ci --time -m1
  time: real .* secs .user [0-9][.].* sys .* (re)