Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-push-checkheads-partial-C3.t @ 50195:11e6eee4b063
transaction: use the standard transaction mechanism to backup branch
Branch is a bit special :
- It currently does not collaborate with the transaction (or any scoping) for
writing (this is bad)
- It can change without the lock being taken (it is protected by `wlock`)
So we rely on the same mechanism as for the backup of the other dirstate file:
- we only do a backup if we hold the wlock
- we force a backup though the transaction
Since "branch" write does not collaborate with the transaction, we cannot back
it up "at the last minute" as we do for the dirstate. We have to back it up
"upfront". Since we have a backup, the transaction is no longer doing its
"quick_abort" and get noisy. Which is quite annoying. To work around this, and
to avoid jumping in yet-another-rabbit-hole of "getting branch written
properly", I am doing horrible things to the transaction in the meantime.
We should be able to get this code go away during the next cycle.
In the meantime, I prefer to take this small stop so that we stop abusing the
"journal" and "undo" mechanism instead of the proper backup mechanism of the
transaction.
Also note that this change regress the warning message for the legacy fallback
introduced in 2008 when issue902 got fixed in dd5a501cb97f (Mercurial 1.0).
I feel like this is fine as issue 902 remains fixed, and this would only affect
people deploying a mix of 15 year old Mercurial and modern mercurial, and using
branch and rollback extensively.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:37:46 +0100 |
parents | 9261f6c1d39b |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
==================================== Testing head checking code: Case C-3 ==================================== Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by some of the new one we push. This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior. Category C: case were the branch is only partially obsoleted TestCase 3: 2 changeset branch, only the head is pruned .. old-state: .. .. * 2 changeset branch .. .. new-state: .. .. * old head is pruned .. * 1 new unrelated branch .. .. expected-result: .. .. * push denied .. .. graph-summary: .. .. B ⊗ .. | .. A ◔ ◔ C .. |/ .. ● $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh Test setup ---------- $ mkdir C3 $ cd C3 $ setuprepos creating basic server and client repo updating to branch default 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd server $ mkcommit B0 $ cd ../client $ hg pull pulling from $TESTTMP/C3/server searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets d73caddc5533 (1 drafts) (run 'hg update' to get a working copy) $ hg up 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkcommit C0 created new head $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(B0)"` 1 new obsolescence markers obsoleted 1 changesets $ hg log -G --hidden @ 0f88766e02d6 (draft): C0 | | x d73caddc5533 (draft): B0 | | | o 8aaa48160adc (draft): A0 |/ o 1e4be0697311 (public): root Actual testing -------------- $ hg push pushing to $TESTTMP/C3/server searching for changes abort: push creates new remote head 0f88766e02d6 (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads) [20] $ cd ../..