view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 22040:122fa73657c6

shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right state. This is similar to what the mq extension is doing. This is an important change as we plan to move phase movement with the transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high level code will avoid them the burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common expected mess-up is to use a different transaction for changesets creation and phase adjustment.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
date Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700
parents a934b9249574
children fc1d75e7a98d
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

  $ hg revert --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a back to normal:

  $ hg status
  ? b

  $ rm b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-a > a
  $ hg commit -m "2a"

  $ hg co -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-b > a
  $ hg commit -m "2b"
  created new head

  $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1
  merging a
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ rm a
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

Revert should fail:

  $ hg revert
  abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified
  (use "hg update" or see "hg help revert")
  [255]

Revert should be ok now:

  $ hg revert -r2 --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged):

  $ hg status
  M a
  ? b

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b