view tests/test-merge-force.t @ 22040:122fa73657c6

shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right state. This is similar to what the mq extension is doing. This is an important change as we plan to move phase movement with the transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high level code will avoid them the burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common expected mess-up is to use a different transaction for changesets creation and phase adjustment.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
date Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700
parents 94c394653b2a
children eeecf29cc397
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add a'

  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add b'

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg rm a
  $ hg ci -m 'rm a'
  created new head

  $ hg up -qC 1
  $ rm a

Local deleted a file, remote removed

Should fail, since there are deleted files:

  $ hg merge
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (use 'hg status' to list changes)
  [255]

Should succeed with --force:

  $ hg -v merge --force
  resolving manifests
  removing a
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Should show 'a' as removed:

  $ hg status
  R a

  $ hg ci -m merge

Should not show 'a':

  $ hg manifest
  b