Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 22040:122fa73657c6
shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand
We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right state.
This is similar to what the mq extension is doing.
This is an important change as we plan to move phase movement with the
transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high level code will avoid them the
burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for
transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common
expected mess-up is to use a different transaction for changesets creation and
phase adjustment.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700 |
parents | 0705f2ac79d6 |
children | 75be14993fda |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > import sys > print 'Using custom patch' > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print '--binary found !' > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..