Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 33886:13dc7f29531e
exchange: don't attempt phase exchange if phase-heads was in bundle
The Mercurial core server doesn't yet include phase-heads parts in the
bundle, but our Google-internal server wants to do
that. Unfortunately, the usual exchange still happens even if
phase-heads part is included (including the short-circuited one for
old/publishing servers). That means that even if our server (again,
the Google-internal one, but also future Mercurial core servers)
includes a phase-heads part to indicate that some heads should be
drafts, that would still get overwritten by the phase updating that
happens after. So let's fix that by marking the phase step done if we
receive at least one phase-heads part in the bundle.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D440
author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:04:47 -0700 |
parents | 75be14993fda |
children | b1f75d8e887a |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > import sys > print 'Using custom patch' > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print '--binary found !' > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=$PYTHON ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..