view tests/test-push-checkheads-partial-C4.t @ 33051:15a79ac823e8

identify: add template support

This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few
changes.

  - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries.
  - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified.  (Plain
    output is unchanged.)  This seems more consistent with other templated
    commands.
  - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list.
  - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes.

I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version
info.  It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending
on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision
is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory
or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has
'+').  The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I
couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out.

The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more
than one entry for a merge.  It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use
{node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node
for 'wdir()'.

Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes.
I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these
items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}.

I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log
templater.  Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with
the corresponding log template.

[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case C-4
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category C: case were the branch is only partially obsoleted
TestCase 4: 2 changeset branch, only the base is pruned

.. old-state:
..
.. * 2 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old base is pruned
.. * 1 new unrelated branch
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push denied
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   B ◔
..     |
..   A ⊗ ◔ C
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir C4
  $ cd C4
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd server
  $ mkcommit B0
  $ cd ../client
  $ hg pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/C4/server (glob)
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit C0
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(A0)"`
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  0f88766e02d6 (draft): C0
  |
  | o  d73caddc5533 (draft): B0
  | |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push --rev 'desc(C0)'
  pushing to $TESTTMP/C4/server (glob)
  searching for changes
  abort: push creates new remote head 0f88766e02d6!
  (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads)
  [255]

  $ cd ../..