view tests/test-changelog-exec.t @ 32488:176d1a0ce385

obsolete: fix relevant-obsmarkers computation on pruned changeset

The markers pruning a node was not directly considered relevant for the pruned
node, only to its parents.

This went unnoticed during obsmarkers exchange because all
ancestors of the pruned node would be included in the computation.
This still affects obsmarkers exchange a bit since "inline" prune markers would
be ignored (see second test case). This went unnoticed, because in such case,
we always push another obsolescence markers for that node.

We add explicit tests covering this case.

(The set of relevant changeset is use in the obsmarkers discovery protocol used
in the evolve experimental extension, the impact will be handled on the
extension side).

#require execbit

b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the
changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test
that that doesn't happen anymore

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar > bar
  $ chmod +x bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

manifest of p2:

  $ hg manifest
  bar
  foo

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

manifest of p1:

  $ hg manifest
  foo

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ chmod +x foo
  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

this should not mention bar but should mention foo:

  $ hg tip -v
  changeset:   3:c53d17ff3380
  tag:         tip
  parent:      2:ed1b79f46b9a
  parent:      1:d394a8db219b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       foo
  description:
  merge
  
  

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000 (re)

  $ cd ..