Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-rebase-base.t @ 34291:1db9abf407c5
revlog: add revmap back to revlog.addgroup
The recent c8b6ed51386b patch removed the linkmapper argument from addgroup, as
part of trying to make addgroup more agnostic from the changegroup format. It
turns out that the changegroup can't resolve linkrevs while iterating over the
deltas, because applying the deltas might affect the linkrev resolution. For
example, when applying a series of changelog entries, the linkmapper just
returns len(cl). If we're iterating over the deltas without applying them to the
changelog, this results in incorrect linkrevs. This was caught by the hgsql
extension, which reads the revisions before applying them.
The fix is to return linknodes as part of the delta iterator, and let the
consumer choose what to do.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D730
author | Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:22:22 -0700 |
parents | 609606d21765 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF > [extensions] > rebase= > drawdag=$TESTDIR/drawdag.py > > [phases] > publish=False > > [alias] > tglog = log -G --template "{rev}: {desc}" > EOF $ rebasewithdag() { > N=`$PYTHON -c "print($N+1)"` > hg init repo$N && cd repo$N > hg debugdrawdag > hg rebase "$@" > _rebasetmp > r=$? > grep -v 'saved backup bundle' _rebasetmp > [ $r -eq 0 ] && hg tglog > cd .. > return $r > } Single branching point, without merge: $ rebasewithdag -b D -d Z <<'EOS' > D E > |/ > Z B C # C: branching point, E should be picked > \|/ # B should not be picked > A > | > R > EOS rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C) rebasing 5:4526cf523425 "D" (D) rebasing 6:b296604d9846 "E" (E tip) o 6: E | | o 5: D |/ o 4: C | o 3: Z | | o 2: B |/ o 1: A | o 0: R Multiple branching points caused by selecting a single merge changeset: $ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOS' > E > /| > B C D # B, C: multiple branching points > | |/ # D should not be picked > Z | / > \|/ > A > | > R > EOS rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B) rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C) rebasing 6:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip) o 6: E |\ | o 5: C | | o | 4: B |/ o 3: Z | | o 2: D |/ o 1: A | o 0: R Rebase should not extend the "--base" revset using "descendants": $ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS' > E > /| > Z B C # descendants(B) = B+E. With E, C will be included incorrectly > \|/ > A > | > R > EOS rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B) rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip) o 5: E |\ | o 4: B | | | o 3: Z | | o | 2: C |/ o 1: A | o 0: R Rebase should not simplify the "--base" revset using "roots": $ rebasewithdag -b B+E -d Z <<'EOS' > E > /| > Z B C # roots(B+E) = B. Without E, C will be missed incorrectly > \|/ > A > | > R > EOS rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B) rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C) rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip) o 5: E |\ | o 4: C | | o | 3: B |/ o 2: Z | o 1: A | o 0: R The destination is one of the two branching points of a merge: $ rebasewithdag -b F -d Z <<'EOS' > F > / \ > E D > / / > Z C > \ / > B > | > A > EOS nothing to rebase [1] Multiple branching points caused by multiple bases (issue5420): $ rebasewithdag -b E1+E2+C2+B1 -d Z <<'EOS' > Z E2 > | / > F E1 C2 > |/ / > E C1 B2 > |/ / > C B1 > |/ > B > | > A > | > R > EOS rebasing 3:a113dbaa660a "B1" (B1) rebasing 5:06ce7b1cc8c2 "B2" (B2) rebasing 6:0ac98cce32d3 "C1" (C1) rebasing 8:781512f5e33d "C2" (C2) rebasing 9:428d8c18f641 "E1" (E1) rebasing 11:e1bf82f6b6df "E2" (E2) o 12: E2 | o 11: E1 | | o 10: C2 | | | o 9: C1 |/ | o 8: B2 | | | o 7: B1 |/ o 6: Z | o 5: F | o 4: E | o 3: C | o 2: B | o 1: A | o 0: R Multiple branching points with multiple merges: $ rebasewithdag -b G+P -d Z <<'EOS' > G H P > |\ /| |\ > F E D M N > \|/| /| |\ > Z C B I J K L > \|/ |/ |/ > A A A > EOS rebasing 2:dc0947a82db8 "C" (C) rebasing 8:4e4f9194f9f1 "D" (D) rebasing 9:03ca77807e91 "E" (E) rebasing 10:afc707c82df0 "F" (F) rebasing 13:690dfff91e9e "G" (G) rebasing 14:2893b886bb10 "H" (H) rebasing 3:08ebfeb61bac "I" (I) rebasing 4:a0a5005cec67 "J" (J) rebasing 5:83780307a7e8 "K" (K) rebasing 6:e131637a1cb6 "L" (L) rebasing 11:d1f6d0c3c7e4 "M" (M) rebasing 12:7aaec6f81888 "N" (N) rebasing 15:325bc8f1760d "P" (P tip) o 15: P |\ | o 14: N | |\ o \ \ 13: M |\ \ \ | | | o 12: L | | | | | | o | 11: K | | |/ | o / 10: J | |/ o / 9: I |/ | o 8: H | |\ | | | o 7: G | | |/| | | | o 6: F | | | | | | o | 5: E | | |/ | o | 4: D | |\| +---o 3: C | | o | 2: Z | | | o 1: B |/ o 0: A Slightly more complex merge case (mentioned in https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-November/091074.html): $ rebasewithdag -b A3+B3 -d Z <<'EOF' > Z C1 A3 B3 > | / / \ / \ > M3 C0 A1 A2 B1 B2 > | / | | | | > M2 M1 C1 C1 M3 > | > M1 > | > M0 > EOF rebasing 4:8817fae53c94 "C0" (C0) rebasing 6:06ca5dfe3b5b "B2" (B2) rebasing 7:73508237b032 "C1" (C1) rebasing 9:fdb955e2faed "A2" (A2) rebasing 11:4e449bd1a643 "A3" (A3) rebasing 10:0a33b0519128 "B1" (B1) rebasing 12:209327807c3a "B3" (B3 tip) o 12: B3 |\ | o 11: B1 | | | | o 10: A3 | | |\ | +---o 9: A2 | | | | o | 8: C1 | | | o | | 7: B2 | | | | o | 6: C0 |/ / o | 5: Z | | o | 4: M3 | | o | 3: M2 | | | o 2: A1 |/ o 1: M1 | o 0: M0 Disconnected graph: $ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS' > B > | > Z A > EOS nothing to rebase from 112478962961 to 48b9aae0607f [1] Multiple roots. Roots are ancestors of dest: $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF' > D Z B > \|\| > C A > EOF rebasing 2:112478962961 "B" (B) rebasing 3:b70f76719894 "D" (D) o 4: D | | o 3: B |/ o 2: Z |\ | o 1: C | o 0: A Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest: $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF' > Z B D > \|\| > A C > EOF nothing to rebase from f675d5a1c6a4+b70f76719894 to 262e37e34f63 [1] Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest. Select using a merge: $ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOF' > E > |\ > Z B D > \|\| > A C > EOF rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B) rebasing 5:f68696fe6af8 "E" (E tip) o 5: E |\ | o 4: B | |\ | | o 3: Z | | | o | | 2: D |/ / o / 1: C / o 0: A Multiple roots. Two children share two parents while dest has only one parent: $ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF' > Z B D > \|\|\ > A C A > EOF rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B) rebasing 3:c2a779e13b56 "D" (D) o 4: D |\ +---o 3: B | |/ | o 2: Z | | o | 1: C / o 0: A Rebasing using a single transaction $ hg init singletr && cd singletr $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF > [rebase] > singletransaction=True > EOF $ hg debugdrawdag <<'EOF' > Z > | > | D > | | > | C > | | > Y B > |/ > A > EOF - We should only see two status stored messages. One from the start, one from - the end. $ hg rebase --debug -b D -d Z | grep 'status stored' rebase status stored rebase status stored $ hg tglog o 5: D | o 4: C | o 3: B | o 2: Z | o 1: Y | o 0: A $ cd ..