view tests/test-merge5.t @ 20275:2123d27ff75d

backout: avoid update on simple case. Before the changeset the backout process was: 1) go to <target> 2) revert to <target> parent 3) update back to changeset we came from The two update steps can takes a very long time to move back and forth unrelated file change between <target> and current working directory. The new process is just merging current working directory with the parent of <target> using <target> as ancestor. This give the very same result but skip the two updates. On big repo with a lot of files and changes that save a lots of time (x20 for one week window). The "merge" version (hg backout --merge) is still done with upgrades. We could imagine using in memory commit to speed it up but this is another fish.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
date Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:53:46 -0800
parents 41abe2e3e3b7
children fe80fdf68ba7
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add a b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b22 > b
  $ hg commit -m "comment #1"
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm b
  $ hg commit -A -m "comment #2"
  removing b
  created new head
  $ hg update 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg update
  abort: not a linear update
  (merge or update --check to force update)
  [255]
  $ rm b
  $ hg update -c
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg revert b
  $ hg update -c
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mv a c

In theory, we shouldn't need the "-y" below, but it prevents this test
from hanging when "hg update" erroneously prompts the user for "keep
or delete".

Should abort:

  $ hg update -y 1
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  [255]
  $ mv c a

Should succeed:

  $ hg update -y 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved