view tests/test-rename-merge1.t @ 40393:229d23cdb203

exchangev2: support fetching shallow files history

This commit teaches the exchangev2 client code to handle fetching shallow
files data.

Only shallow fetching of files data is supported: shallow fetching of
changeset and manifest data is explicitly not yet supported.

Previously, we would fetch file revisions for changesets that were received
by the current pull operation. In the new model, we calculate the set of
"relevant" changesets given the pull depth and only fetch files data for
those changesets.

We also teach the "filesdata" command invocation to vary parameters as needed.

The implementation here is far from complete or optimal. Subsequent pulls will
end up re-fetching a lot of files data. But the application of this data should
mostly be a no-op on the client, so it isn't a big deal.

Depending on the order file revisions are fetched in, revisions could get
inserted with the wrong revision number relationships. I think the best way
to deal with this is to remove revision numbers from storage and to either
dynamically derive them (by reconstructing a DAG from nodes/parents) or remove
revision numbers from the file storage interface completely.

A missing API that we'll likely want to write pretty soon is "ensure files
for revision(s) are present." We can kind of cajole exchangev2.pull() to do
this. But it isn't very efficient. For example, in simple cases like
widening the store to obtain data for a single revision, it is probably
more efficient to walk the manifest and find exactly which file revisions
are missing and to make explicit requests for just their data. In more
advanced cases, asking the server for all files data may be more efficient,
even though it requires sending data the client already has. There is tons
of room for future experimentation here. And TBH I'm not sure what the
final state will be.

Anyway, this commit gets us pretty close to being able to have shallow
and narrow checkouts with exchangev2/sqlite storage. Close enough that a
minimal extension should be able to provide fill in the gaps until the code
in core stabilizes and there is a user-facing way to trigger the
narrow/shallow bits from `hg clone` without also implying using of the
narrow extension...

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5169

  $ hg init

  $ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc

  $ echo foo > a
  $ echo foo > a2
  $ hg add a a2
  $ hg ci -m "start"

  $ hg mv a b
  $ hg mv a2 b2
  $ hg ci -m "rename"

  $ hg co 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo blahblah > a
  $ echo blahblah > a2
  $ hg mv a2 c2
  $ hg ci -m "modify"
  created new head

  $ hg merge -y --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     c2
    unmatched files in other:
     b
     b2
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
     src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
     src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
  note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
   c2
   b2
   preserving a for resolve of b
  removing a
   b2: remote created -> g
  getting b2
   b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging a and b to b
  my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
   premerge successful
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status -AC
  M b
    a
  M b2
  R a
  C c2

  $ cat b
  blahblah

  $ hg ci -m "merge"

  $ hg debugindex b
     rev linkrev nodeid       p1           p2
       0       1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000
       1       3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f

  $ hg debugrename b
  b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66

This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames

  $ hg cp b b3
  $ hg cp b b4
  $ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
  $ hg up eb92d88a9712
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg rm b3 b4
  $ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'

We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)

  $ hg cp b b3
  $ hg mv b b4
  $ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
  $ hg up c761c6948de0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Check for issue2642

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t

  $ echo c0 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm0

  $ hg up null -q
  $ echo c1 > f1 # backport
  $ hg ci -Aqm1
  $ hg mv f1 f2
  $ hg ci -qm2

  $ hg up 0 -q
  $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
  $ hg ci -qm3

  $ hg merge 2
  merging f1 and f2 to f2
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat f2
  c0

  $ cd ..

Check for issue2089

  $ hg init repo2089
  $ cd repo2089

  $ echo c0 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm0

  $ hg up null -q
  $ echo c1 > f1
  $ hg ci -Aqm1

  $ hg up 0 -q
  $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
  $ echo c2 > f1
  $ hg ci -qm2

  $ hg up 1 -q
  $ hg mv f1 f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm3

  $ hg up 2 -q
  $ hg merge 3
  merging f1 and f2 to f2
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat f2
  c2

  $ cd ..

Check for issue3074

  $ hg init repo3074
  $ cd repo3074
  $ echo foo > file
  $ hg add file
  $ hg commit -m "added file"
  $ hg mv file newfile
  $ hg commit -m "renamed file"
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg rm file
  $ hg commit -m "deleted file"
  created new head
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     newfile
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
  note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
   newfile
   newfile: remote created -> g
  getting newfile
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status
  M newfile
  $ cd ..