tests/test-patch.t
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:05:26 -0400
changeset 38414 235d0bc11e1d
parent 38305 1445b556e9d2
child 39707 5abc47d4ca6b
permissions -rw-r--r--
fileset: use filectx.isbinary() to filter out binaries in eol() Since LFS stores the binary attribute in the pointer file, this means that the file doesn't need to be downloaded in order to be skipped. This function also catches an IOError if the data can't be loaded in the non-LFS case. I wonder if it's worth storing the unix/dos attributes in the pointer file as well, though I'd expect LFS files to be binary most of the time.

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function
  > import sys
  > print('Using custom patch')
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print('--binary found !')
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=$PYTHON ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 8580ff50825a
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 7fadb901d403
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  

Error exit (issue4746)

  $ cat >> exit1.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > sys.exit(1)
  > EOF

  $ hg import ../c/p --config ui.patch="\"$PYTHON\" \"`pwd`/exit1.py\""
  applying ../c/p
  abort: patch command failed: exited with status 1
  [255]

  $ cd ..