view tests/test-double-merge.t @ 22196:23fe278bde43

largefiles: keep largefiles from colliding with normal one during linear merge

Before this patch, linear merging of modified or newly added largefile
causes unexpected result, if (1) largefile collides with same name
normal one in the target revision and (2) "local" largefile is chosen,
even though branch merging between such revisions doesn't.

Expected result of such linear merging is:

  (1) (not yet recorded) largefile is kept in the working directory
  (2) largefile is marked as (re-)"added"
  (3) colliding normal file is marked as "removed"

But actual result is:

  (1) largefile in the working directory is unlinked
  (2) largefile is marked as "normal" (so treated as "missing")
  (3) the dirstate entry for colliding normal file is just dropped

(1) is very serious, because there is no way to restore temporarily
modified largefiles.

(3) prevents the next commit from adding the manifest with correct
"removal of (normal) file" information for newly created changeset.

The root cause of this problem is putting "lfile" into "actions['r']"
in linear-merging case. At liner merging, "actions['r']" causes:

  - unlinking "target file" in the working directory, but "lfile" as
    "target file" is also largefile itself in this case

  - dropping the dirstate entry for target file

"actions['f']" (= "forget") does only the latter, and this is reason
why this patch doesn't choose putting "lfile" into it instead of
"actions['r']".

This patch newly introduces action "lfmr" (LargeFiles: Mark as
Removed) to mark colliding normal file as "removed" without unlinking
it.

This patch uses "hg debugdirstate" instead of "hg status" in test,
because:

  - choosing "local largefile" hides "removed" status of "remote
    normal file" in "hg status" output, and

  - "hg status" for "large2" in this case has another problem fixed in
    the subsequent patch

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m
  updating: bar 1/2 files (50.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m
  updating: foo 2/2 files (100.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for foo (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..