Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-unified-test.t @ 22196:23fe278bde43
largefiles: keep largefiles from colliding with normal one during linear merge
Before this patch, linear merging of modified or newly added largefile
causes unexpected result, if (1) largefile collides with same name
normal one in the target revision and (2) "local" largefile is chosen,
even though branch merging between such revisions doesn't.
Expected result of such linear merging is:
(1) (not yet recorded) largefile is kept in the working directory
(2) largefile is marked as (re-)"added"
(3) colliding normal file is marked as "removed"
But actual result is:
(1) largefile in the working directory is unlinked
(2) largefile is marked as "normal" (so treated as "missing")
(3) the dirstate entry for colliding normal file is just dropped
(1) is very serious, because there is no way to restore temporarily
modified largefiles.
(3) prevents the next commit from adding the manifest with correct
"removal of (normal) file" information for newly created changeset.
The root cause of this problem is putting "lfile" into "actions['r']"
in linear-merging case. At liner merging, "actions['r']" causes:
- unlinking "target file" in the working directory, but "lfile" as
"target file" is also largefile itself in this case
- dropping the dirstate entry for target file
"actions['f']" (= "forget") does only the latter, and this is reason
why this patch doesn't choose putting "lfile" into it instead of
"actions['r']".
This patch newly introduces action "lfmr" (LargeFiles: Mark as
Removed) to mark colliding normal file as "removed" without unlinking
it.
This patch uses "hg debugdirstate" instead of "hg status" in test,
because:
- choosing "local largefile" hides "removed" status of "remote
normal file" in "hg status" output, and
- "hg status" for "large2" in this case has another problem fixed in
the subsequent patch
author | FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:28:51 +0900 |
parents | 204f6a6e9b57 |
children | 9599e86159ac |
line wrap: on
line source
Test that the syntax of "unified tests" is properly processed ============================================================== Simple commands: $ echo foo foo $ printf 'oh no' oh no (no-eol) $ printf 'bar\nbaz\n' | cat bar baz Multi-line command: $ foo() { > echo bar > } $ foo bar Return codes before inline python: $ sh -c 'exit 1' [1] Doctest commands: >>> print 'foo' foo $ echo interleaved interleaved >>> for c in 'xyz': ... print c x y z >>> print Regular expressions: $ echo foobarbaz foobar.* (re) $ echo barbazquux .*quux.* (re) Globs: $ printf '* \\foobarbaz {10}\n' \* \\fo?bar* {10} (glob) Literal match ending in " (re)": $ echo 'foo (re)' foo (re) Windows: \r\n is handled like \n and can be escaped: #if windows $ printf 'crlf\r\ncr\r\tcrlf\r\ncrlf\r\n' crlf cr\r (no-eol) (esc) \tcrlf (esc) crlf\r (esc) #endif Combining esc with other markups - and handling lines ending with \r instead of \n: $ printf 'foo/bar\r' fo?/bar\r (no-eol) (glob) (esc) #if windows $ printf 'foo\\bar\r' foo/bar\r (no-eol) (glob) (esc) #endif $ printf 'foo/bar\rfoo/bar\r' foo.bar\r \(no-eol\) (re) (esc) foo.bar\r \(no-eol\) (re) testing hghave $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" true $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" false skipped: missing feature: nail clipper [1] $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" no-true skipped: system supports yak shaving [1] $ "$TESTDIR/hghave" no-false Conditional sections based on hghave: #if true $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if false $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif #if no-false $ echo tested tested #else $ echo skipped #endif #if no-true $ echo skipped #else $ echo tested tested #endif Exit code: $ (exit 1) [1]