Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-narrow-pull.t @ 43112:24a07347aa60
check-commit: allow foo_bar naming in functions
nameswithallthewordssmashedtogetherarehardtoread.
especiallyifenglishisnotyourprimarylanguage.
Let's align with the rest of the programming universe and
allow_the_use_of_underscores_in_names.
We took a hand poll at the 5.2 sprint regarding this change and
all but 1 person supported it. The person who didn't expressed
concerns around excessive API breakage if we mass renamed things.
But we're not planning to mass rename things for the sake of
renaming, so all should be well.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2010
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:13:42 -0800 |
parents | 7db1619af061 |
children | 5c2a4f37eace |
line wrap: on
line source
$ . "$TESTDIR/narrow-library.sh" $ hg init master $ cd master $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF > [narrow] > serveellipses=True > EOF $ for x in `$TESTDIR/seq.py 10` > do > echo $x > "f$x" > hg add "f$x" > hg commit -m "Commit f$x" > done $ cd .. narrow clone a couple files, f2 and f8 $ hg clone --narrow ssh://user@dummy/master narrow --include "f2" --include "f8" requesting all changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 5 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files new changesets *:* (glob) updating to branch default 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd narrow $ ls f2 f8 $ cat f2 f8 2 8 $ cd .. change every upstream file twice $ cd master $ for x in `$TESTDIR/seq.py 10` > do > echo "update#1 $x" >> "f$x" > hg commit -m "Update#1 to f$x" "f$x" > done $ for x in `$TESTDIR/seq.py 10` > do > echo "update#2 $x" >> "f$x" > hg commit -m "Update#2 to f$x" "f$x" > done $ cd .. look for incoming changes $ cd narrow $ hg incoming --limit 3 comparing with ssh://user@dummy/master searching for changes changeset: 5:ddc055582556 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: Update#1 to f1 changeset: 6:f66eb5ad621d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: Update#1 to f2 changeset: 7:c42ecff04e99 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: Update#1 to f3 Interrupting the pull is safe $ hg --config hooks.pretxnchangegroup.bad=false pull -q transaction abort! rollback completed abort: pretxnchangegroup.bad hook exited with status 1 [255] $ hg id 223311e70a6f tip pull new changes down to the narrow clone. Should get 8 new changesets: 4 relevant to the narrow spec, and 4 ellipsis nodes gluing them all together. $ hg pull pulling from ssh://user@dummy/master searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 9 changesets with 4 changes to 2 files new changesets *:* (glob) (run 'hg update' to get a working copy) $ hg log -T '{rev}: {desc}\n' 13: Update#2 to f10 12: Update#2 to f8 11: Update#2 to f7 10: Update#2 to f2 9: Update#2 to f1 8: Update#1 to f8 7: Update#1 to f7 6: Update#1 to f2 5: Update#1 to f1 4: Commit f10 3: Commit f8 2: Commit f7 1: Commit f2 0: Commit f1 $ hg update tip 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved add a change and push it $ echo "update#3 2" >> f2 $ hg commit -m "Update#3 to f2" f2 $ hg log f2 -T '{rev}: {desc}\n' 14: Update#3 to f2 10: Update#2 to f2 6: Update#1 to f2 1: Commit f2 $ hg push pushing to ssh://user@dummy/master searching for changes remote: adding changesets remote: adding manifests remote: adding file changes remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files $ cd .. $ cd master $ hg log f2 -T '{rev}: {desc}\n' 30: Update#3 to f2 21: Update#2 to f2 11: Update#1 to f2 1: Commit f2 $ hg log -l 3 -T '{rev}: {desc}\n' 30: Update#3 to f2 29: Update#2 to f10 28: Update#2 to f9 Can pull into repo with a single commit $ cd .. $ hg clone -q --narrow ssh://user@dummy/master narrow2 --include "f1" -r 0 $ cd narrow2 $ hg pull -q -r 1 transaction abort! rollback completed abort: pull failed on remote [255]