view mercurial/simplemerge.py @ 31765:264baeef3588

show: new extension for displaying various repository data Currently, Mercurial has a number of commands to show information. And, there are features coming down the pipe that will introduce more commands for showing information. Currently, when introducing a new class of data or a view that we wish to expose to the user, the strategy is to introduce a new command or overload an existing command, sometimes both. For example, there is a desire to formalize the wip/smartlog/underway/mine functionality that many have devised. There is also a desire to introduce a "topics" concept. Others would like views of "the current stack." In the current model, we'd need a new command for wip/smartlog/etc (that behaves a lot like a pre-defined alias of `hg log`). For topics, we'd likely overload `hg topic[s]` to both display and manipulate topics. Adding new commands for every pre-defined query doesn't scale well and pollutes `hg help`. Overloading commands to perform read-only and write operations is arguably an UX anti-pattern: while having all functionality for a given concept in one command is nice, having a single command doing multiple discrete operations is not. Furthermore, a user may be surprised that a command they thought was read-only actually changes something. We discussed this at the Mercurial 4.0 Sprint in Paris and decided that having a single command where we could hang pre-defined views of various data would be a good idea. Having such a command would: * Help prevent an explosion of new query-related commands * Create a clear separation between read and write operations (mitigates footguns) * Avoids overloading the meaning of commands that manipulate data (bookmark, tag, branch, etc) (while we can't take away the existing behavior for BC reasons, we now won't introduce this behavior on new commands) * Allows users to discover informational views more easily by aggregating them in a single location * Lowers the barrier to creating the new views (since the barrier to creating a top-level command is relatively high) So, this commit introduces the `hg show` command via the "show" extension. This command accepts a positional argument of the "view" to show. New views can be registered with a decorator. To prove it works, we implement the "bookmarks" view, which shows a table of bookmarks and their associated nodes. We introduce a new style to hold everything used by `hg show`. For our initial bookmarks view, the output varies from `hg bookmarks`: * Padding is performed in the template itself as opposed to Python * Revision integers are not shown * shortest() is used to display a 5 character node by default (as opposed to static 12 characters) I chose to implement the "bookmarks" view first because it is simple and shouldn't invite too much bikeshedding that detracts from the evaluation of `hg show` itself. But there is an important point to consider: we now have 2 ways to show a list of bookmarks. I'm not a fan of introducing multiple ways to do very similar things. So it might be worth discussing how we wish to tackle this issue for bookmarks, tags, branches, MQ series, etc. I also made the choice of explicitly declaring the default show template not part of the standard BC guarantees. History has shown that we make mistakes and poor choices with output formatting but can't fix these mistakes later because random tools are parsing output and we don't want to break these tools. Optimizing for human consumption is one of my goals for `hg show`. So, by not covering the formatting as part of BC, the barrier to future change is much lower and humans benefit. There are some improvements that can be made to formatting. For example, we don't yet use label() in the templates. We obviously want this for color. But I'm not sure if we should reuse the existing log.* labels or invent new ones. I figure we can punt that to a follow-up. At the aforementioned Sprint, we discussed and discarded various alternatives to `hg show`. We considered making `hg log <view>` perform this behavior. The main reason we can't do this is because a positional argument to `hg log` can be a file path and if there is a conflict between a path name and a view name, behavior is ambiguous. We could have introduced `hg log --view` or similar, but we felt that required too much typing (we don't want to require a command flag to show a view) and wasn't very discoverable. Furthermore, `hg log` is optimized for showing changelog data and there are things that `hg display` could display that aren't changelog centric. There were concerns about using "show" as the command name. Some users already have a "show" alias that is similar to `hg export`. There were also concerns that Git users adapted to `git show` would be confused by `hg show`'s different behavior. The main difference here is `git show` prints an `hg export` like view of the current commit by default and `hg show` requires an argument. `git show` can also display any Git object. `git show` does not support displaying more complex views: just single objects. If we implemented `hg show <hash>` or `hg show <identifier>`, `hg show` would be a superset of `git show`. Although, I'm hesitant to do that at this time because I view `hg show` as a higher-level querying command and there are namespace collisions between valid identifiers and registered views. There is also a prefix collision with `hg showconfig`, which is an alias of `hg config`. We also considered `hg view`, but that is already used by the "hgk" extension. `hg display` was also proposed at one point. It has a prefix collision with `hg diff`. General consensus was "show" or "view" are the best verbs. And since "view" was taken, "show" was chosen. There are a number of inline TODOs in this patch. Some of these represent decisions yet to be made. Others represent features requiring non-trivial complexity. Rather than bloat the patch or invite additional bikeshedding, I figured I'd document future enhancements via TODO so we can get a minimal implmentation landed. Something is better than nothing.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:19:00 -0700
parents 35284f933518
children c31d45623304
line wrap: on
line source

# Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Canonical Ltd
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

# mbp: "you know that thing where cvs gives you conflict markers?"
# s: "i hate that."

from __future__ import absolute_import

import os

from .i18n import _
from . import (
    error,
    mdiff,
    util,
    vfs as vfsmod,
)

class CantReprocessAndShowBase(Exception):
    pass

def intersect(ra, rb):
    """Given two ranges return the range where they intersect or None.

    >>> intersect((0, 10), (0, 6))
    (0, 6)
    >>> intersect((0, 10), (5, 15))
    (5, 10)
    >>> intersect((0, 10), (10, 15))
    >>> intersect((0, 9), (10, 15))
    >>> intersect((0, 9), (7, 15))
    (7, 9)
    """
    assert ra[0] <= ra[1]
    assert rb[0] <= rb[1]

    sa = max(ra[0], rb[0])
    sb = min(ra[1], rb[1])
    if sa < sb:
        return sa, sb
    else:
        return None

def compare_range(a, astart, aend, b, bstart, bend):
    """Compare a[astart:aend] == b[bstart:bend], without slicing.
    """
    if (aend - astart) != (bend - bstart):
        return False
    for ia, ib in zip(xrange(astart, aend), xrange(bstart, bend)):
        if a[ia] != b[ib]:
            return False
    else:
        return True

class Merge3Text(object):
    """3-way merge of texts.

    Given strings BASE, OTHER, THIS, tries to produce a combined text
    incorporating the changes from both BASE->OTHER and BASE->THIS."""
    def __init__(self, basetext, atext, btext, base=None, a=None, b=None):
        self.basetext = basetext
        self.atext = atext
        self.btext = btext
        if base is None:
            base = mdiff.splitnewlines(basetext)
        if a is None:
            a = mdiff.splitnewlines(atext)
        if b is None:
            b = mdiff.splitnewlines(btext)
        self.base = base
        self.a = a
        self.b = b

    def merge_lines(self,
                    name_a=None,
                    name_b=None,
                    name_base=None,
                    start_marker='<<<<<<<',
                    mid_marker='=======',
                    end_marker='>>>>>>>',
                    base_marker=None,
                    localorother=None,
                    minimize=False):
        """Return merge in cvs-like form.
        """
        self.conflicts = False
        newline = '\n'
        if len(self.a) > 0:
            if self.a[0].endswith('\r\n'):
                newline = '\r\n'
            elif self.a[0].endswith('\r'):
                newline = '\r'
        if name_a and start_marker:
            start_marker = start_marker + ' ' + name_a
        if name_b and end_marker:
            end_marker = end_marker + ' ' + name_b
        if name_base and base_marker:
            base_marker = base_marker + ' ' + name_base
        merge_regions = self.merge_regions()
        if minimize:
            merge_regions = self.minimize(merge_regions)
        for t in merge_regions:
            what = t[0]
            if what == 'unchanged':
                for i in range(t[1], t[2]):
                    yield self.base[i]
            elif what == 'a' or what == 'same':
                for i in range(t[1], t[2]):
                    yield self.a[i]
            elif what == 'b':
                for i in range(t[1], t[2]):
                    yield self.b[i]
            elif what == 'conflict':
                if localorother == 'local':
                    for i in range(t[3], t[4]):
                        yield self.a[i]
                elif localorother == 'other':
                    for i in range(t[5], t[6]):
                        yield self.b[i]
                else:
                    self.conflicts = True
                    if start_marker is not None:
                        yield start_marker + newline
                    for i in range(t[3], t[4]):
                        yield self.a[i]
                    if base_marker is not None:
                        yield base_marker + newline
                        for i in range(t[1], t[2]):
                            yield self.base[i]
                    if mid_marker is not None:
                        yield mid_marker + newline
                    for i in range(t[5], t[6]):
                        yield self.b[i]
                    if end_marker is not None:
                        yield end_marker + newline
            else:
                raise ValueError(what)

    def merge_groups(self):
        """Yield sequence of line groups.  Each one is a tuple:

        'unchanged', lines
             Lines unchanged from base

        'a', lines
             Lines taken from a

        'same', lines
             Lines taken from a (and equal to b)

        'b', lines
             Lines taken from b

        'conflict', base_lines, a_lines, b_lines
             Lines from base were changed to either a or b and conflict.
        """
        for t in self.merge_regions():
            what = t[0]
            if what == 'unchanged':
                yield what, self.base[t[1]:t[2]]
            elif what == 'a' or what == 'same':
                yield what, self.a[t[1]:t[2]]
            elif what == 'b':
                yield what, self.b[t[1]:t[2]]
            elif what == 'conflict':
                yield (what,
                       self.base[t[1]:t[2]],
                       self.a[t[3]:t[4]],
                       self.b[t[5]:t[6]])
            else:
                raise ValueError(what)

    def merge_regions(self):
        """Return sequences of matching and conflicting regions.

        This returns tuples, where the first value says what kind we
        have:

        'unchanged', start, end
             Take a region of base[start:end]

        'same', astart, aend
             b and a are different from base but give the same result

        'a', start, end
             Non-clashing insertion from a[start:end]

        'conflict', zstart, zend, astart, aend, bstart, bend
            Conflict between a and b, with z as common ancestor

        Method is as follows:

        The two sequences align only on regions which match the base
        and both descendants.  These are found by doing a two-way diff
        of each one against the base, and then finding the
        intersections between those regions.  These "sync regions"
        are by definition unchanged in both and easily dealt with.

        The regions in between can be in any of three cases:
        conflicted, or changed on only one side.
        """

        # section a[0:ia] has been disposed of, etc
        iz = ia = ib = 0

        for region in self.find_sync_regions():
            zmatch, zend, amatch, aend, bmatch, bend = region
            #print 'match base [%d:%d]' % (zmatch, zend)

            matchlen = zend - zmatch
            assert matchlen >= 0
            assert matchlen == (aend - amatch)
            assert matchlen == (bend - bmatch)

            len_a = amatch - ia
            len_b = bmatch - ib
            len_base = zmatch - iz
            assert len_a >= 0
            assert len_b >= 0
            assert len_base >= 0

            #print 'unmatched a=%d, b=%d' % (len_a, len_b)

            if len_a or len_b:
                # try to avoid actually slicing the lists
                equal_a = compare_range(self.a, ia, amatch,
                                        self.base, iz, zmatch)
                equal_b = compare_range(self.b, ib, bmatch,
                                        self.base, iz, zmatch)
                same = compare_range(self.a, ia, amatch,
                                     self.b, ib, bmatch)

                if same:
                    yield 'same', ia, amatch
                elif equal_a and not equal_b:
                    yield 'b', ib, bmatch
                elif equal_b and not equal_a:
                    yield 'a', ia, amatch
                elif not equal_a and not equal_b:
                    yield 'conflict', iz, zmatch, ia, amatch, ib, bmatch
                else:
                    raise AssertionError("can't handle a=b=base but unmatched")

                ia = amatch
                ib = bmatch
            iz = zmatch

            # if the same part of the base was deleted on both sides
            # that's OK, we can just skip it.


            if matchlen > 0:
                assert ia == amatch
                assert ib == bmatch
                assert iz == zmatch

                yield 'unchanged', zmatch, zend
                iz = zend
                ia = aend
                ib = bend

    def minimize(self, merge_regions):
        """Trim conflict regions of lines where A and B sides match.

        Lines where both A and B have made the same changes at the beginning
        or the end of each merge region are eliminated from the conflict
        region and are instead considered the same.
        """
        for region in merge_regions:
            if region[0] != "conflict":
                yield region
                continue
            issue, z1, z2, a1, a2, b1, b2 = region
            alen = a2 - a1
            blen = b2 - b1

            # find matches at the front
            ii = 0
            while ii < alen and ii < blen and \
                  self.a[a1 + ii] == self.b[b1 + ii]:
                ii += 1
            startmatches = ii

            # find matches at the end
            ii = 0
            while ii < alen and ii < blen and \
                  self.a[a2 - ii - 1] == self.b[b2 - ii - 1]:
                ii += 1
            endmatches = ii

            if startmatches > 0:
                yield 'same', a1, a1 + startmatches

            yield ('conflict', z1, z2,
                    a1 + startmatches, a2 - endmatches,
                    b1 + startmatches, b2 - endmatches)

            if endmatches > 0:
                yield 'same', a2 - endmatches, a2

    def find_sync_regions(self):
        """Return a list of sync regions, where both descendants match the base.

        Generates a list of (base1, base2, a1, a2, b1, b2).  There is
        always a zero-length sync region at the end of all the files.
        """

        ia = ib = 0
        amatches = mdiff.get_matching_blocks(self.basetext, self.atext)
        bmatches = mdiff.get_matching_blocks(self.basetext, self.btext)
        len_a = len(amatches)
        len_b = len(bmatches)

        sl = []

        while ia < len_a and ib < len_b:
            abase, amatch, alen = amatches[ia]
            bbase, bmatch, blen = bmatches[ib]

            # there is an unconflicted block at i; how long does it
            # extend?  until whichever one ends earlier.
            i = intersect((abase, abase + alen), (bbase, bbase + blen))
            if i:
                intbase = i[0]
                intend = i[1]
                intlen = intend - intbase

                # found a match of base[i[0], i[1]]; this may be less than
                # the region that matches in either one
                assert intlen <= alen
                assert intlen <= blen
                assert abase <= intbase
                assert bbase <= intbase

                asub = amatch + (intbase - abase)
                bsub = bmatch + (intbase - bbase)
                aend = asub + intlen
                bend = bsub + intlen

                assert self.base[intbase:intend] == self.a[asub:aend], \
                       (self.base[intbase:intend], self.a[asub:aend])

                assert self.base[intbase:intend] == self.b[bsub:bend]

                sl.append((intbase, intend,
                           asub, aend,
                           bsub, bend))

            # advance whichever one ends first in the base text
            if (abase + alen) < (bbase + blen):
                ia += 1
            else:
                ib += 1

        intbase = len(self.base)
        abase = len(self.a)
        bbase = len(self.b)
        sl.append((intbase, intbase, abase, abase, bbase, bbase))

        return sl

    def find_unconflicted(self):
        """Return a list of ranges in base that are not conflicted."""
        am = mdiff.get_matching_blocks(self.basetext, self.atext)
        bm = mdiff.get_matching_blocks(self.basetext, self.btext)

        unc = []

        while am and bm:
            # there is an unconflicted block at i; how long does it
            # extend?  until whichever one ends earlier.
            a1 = am[0][0]
            a2 = a1 + am[0][2]
            b1 = bm[0][0]
            b2 = b1 + bm[0][2]
            i = intersect((a1, a2), (b1, b2))
            if i:
                unc.append(i)

            if a2 < b2:
                del am[0]
            else:
                del bm[0]

        return unc

def simplemerge(ui, local, base, other, **opts):
    def readfile(filename):
        f = open(filename, "rb")
        text = f.read()
        f.close()
        if util.binary(text):
            msg = _("%s looks like a binary file.") % filename
            if not opts.get('quiet'):
                ui.warn(_('warning: %s\n') % msg)
            if not opts.get('text'):
                raise error.Abort(msg)
        return text

    mode = opts.get('mode','merge')
    if mode == 'union':
        name_a = None
        name_b = None
        name_base = None
    else:
        name_a = local
        name_b = other
        name_base = None
        labels = opts.get('label', [])
        if len(labels) > 0:
            name_a = labels[0]
        if len(labels) > 1:
            name_b = labels[1]
        if len(labels) > 2:
            name_base = labels[2]
        if len(labels) > 3:
            raise error.Abort(_("can only specify three labels."))

    try:
        localtext = readfile(local)
        basetext = readfile(base)
        othertext = readfile(other)
    except error.Abort:
        return 1

    local = os.path.realpath(local)
    if not opts.get('print'):
        opener = vfsmod.vfs(os.path.dirname(local))
        out = opener(os.path.basename(local), "w", atomictemp=True)
    else:
        out = ui.fout

    m3 = Merge3Text(basetext, localtext, othertext)
    extrakwargs = {
            "localorother": opts.get("localorother", None),
            'minimize': True,
        }
    if mode == 'union':
        extrakwargs['start_marker'] = None
        extrakwargs['mid_marker'] = None
        extrakwargs['end_marker'] = None
    elif name_base is not None:
        extrakwargs['base_marker'] = '|||||||'
        extrakwargs['name_base'] = name_base
        extrakwargs['minimize'] = False
    for line in m3.merge_lines(name_a=name_a, name_b=name_b, **extrakwargs):
        out.write(line)

    if not opts.get('print'):
        out.close()

    if m3.conflicts and not mode == 'union':
        return 1