view tests/test-stack.t @ 42341:27d6956d386b

match: use '' instead of '.' for root directory (API)

I think '' is generally a better value for the root directory than '.'
is. For example, os.path.join('', 'foo') => 'foo', while
os.path.join('.', 'foo') => './foo'.

This patch mostly makes it so we use '' internally in
match.py. However, it also affects the API in visitdir(),
visitchildrenset() and files(). The two former now also accept '' as
input. I've updated the callers of these methods. I've also added a
deprecation warning for passing '.' (for external callers). The only
caller I could find that was affected by files() returning '' instead
of '.' was in dirstate.walk(). I've updated that.

The next few patches show some workarounds we can remove by using ''
instead of '.'.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6401

This test test the low-level definition of stack, agnostic from all formatting

Initial setup

  $ cat << EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > logtemplate = {rev} {branch} {phase} {desc|firstline}\n
  > [extensions]
  > rebase=
  > [experimental]
  > evolution=createmarkers,exchange,allowunstable
  > EOF

  $ hg init main
  $ cd main
  $ hg branch other
  marked working directory as branch other
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ echo aaa > aaa
  $ hg add aaa
  $ hg commit -m c_a
  $ echo aaa > bbb
  $ hg add bbb
  $ hg commit -m c_b
  $ hg branch foo
  marked working directory as branch foo
  $ echo aaa > ccc
  $ hg add ccc
  $ hg commit -m c_c
  $ echo aaa > ddd
  $ hg add ddd
  $ hg commit -m c_d
  $ echo aaa > eee
  $ hg add eee
  $ hg commit -m c_e
  $ echo aaa > fff
  $ hg add fff
  $ hg commit -m c_f
  $ hg log -G
  @  5 foo draft c_f
  |
  o  4 foo draft c_e
  |
  o  3 foo draft c_d
  |
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  o  1 other draft c_b
  |
  o  0 other draft c_a
  

Check that stack doesn't include public changesets
--------------------------------------------------

  $ hg up other
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 4 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  1 other draft c_b
  |
  o  0 other draft c_a
  
  $ hg phase --public 'branch("other")'
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  $ hg up foo
  4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Simple test
-----------

'stack()' list all changeset in the branch

  $ hg branch
  foo
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  5 foo draft c_f
  |
  o  4 foo draft c_e
  |
  o  3 foo draft c_d
  |
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  ~

Case with some of the branch unstable
------------------------------------

  $ hg up 3
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo bbb > ddd
  $ hg commit --amend
  2 new orphan changesets
  $ hg log -G
  @  6 foo draft c_d
  |
  | *  5 foo draft c_f
  | |
  | *  4 foo draft c_e
  | |
  | x  3 foo draft c_d
  |/
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  o  1 other public c_b
  |
  o  0 other public c_a
  
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  6 foo draft c_d
  |
  ~
  $ hg up -r "desc(c_e)"
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  4 foo draft c_e
  |
  x  3 foo draft c_d
  |
  ~
  $ hg up -r "desc(c_d)"
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  6 foo draft c_d
  |
  ~

Case with multiple topological heads
------------------------------------

Make things linear again

  $ hg rebase -s 'desc(c_e)' -d 'desc(c_d) - obsolete()'
  rebasing 4:4f2a69f6d380 "c_e"
  rebasing 5:913c298d8b0a "c_f"
  $ hg log -G
  o  8 foo draft c_f
  |
  o  7 foo draft c_e
  |
  @  6 foo draft c_d
  |
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  o  1 other public c_b
  |
  o  0 other public c_a
  

Create the second branch

  $ hg up 'desc(c_d)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo aaa > ggg
  $ hg add ggg
  $ hg commit -m c_g
  created new head
  $ echo aaa > hhh
  $ hg add hhh
  $ hg commit -m c_h
  $ hg log -G
  @  10 foo draft c_h
  |
  o  9 foo draft c_g
  |
  | o  8 foo draft c_f
  | |
  | o  7 foo draft c_e
  |/
  o  6 foo draft c_d
  |
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  o  1 other public c_b
  |
  o  0 other public c_a
  

Test output

  $ hg log -G -r "stack(10)"
  @  10 foo draft c_h
  |
  o  9 foo draft c_g
  |
  ~
  $ hg log -G -r "stack(8)"
  o  8 foo draft c_f
  |
  o  7 foo draft c_e
  |
  ~
  $ hg log -G -r "stack(head())"
  @  10 foo draft c_h
  |
  o  9 foo draft c_g
  |
  ~
  o  8 foo draft c_f
  |
  o  7 foo draft c_e
  |
  ~
Check the stack order
  $ hg log -r "first(stack())"
  9 foo draft c_g
  $ hg log -r "first(stack(10))"
  9 foo draft c_g
  $ hg log -r "first(stack(8))"
  7 foo draft c_e
  $ hg log -r "first(stack(head()))"
  7 foo draft c_e

Case with multiple heads with unstability involved
--------------------------------------------------

We amend the message to make sure the display base pick the right changeset

  $ hg up 'desc(c_d)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo ccc > ddd
  $ hg commit --amend -m 'c_D'
  4 new orphan changesets
  $ hg rebase -d . -s 'desc(c_g)'
  rebasing 9:2ebb6e48ab8a "c_g"
  rebasing 10:634f38e27a1d "c_h"
  $ hg log -G
  o  13 foo draft c_h
  |
  o  12 foo draft c_g
  |
  @  11 foo draft c_D
  |
  | *  8 foo draft c_f
  | |
  | *  7 foo draft c_e
  | |
  | x  6 foo draft c_d
  |/
  o  2 foo draft c_c
  |
  o  1 other public c_b
  |
  o  0 other public c_a
  

We should improve stack definition to also show 12 and 13 here
  $ hg log -G -r "stack()"
  @  11 foo draft c_D
  |
  ~