tests/test-diff-newlines.t
author Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org>
Sun, 26 Jun 2016 18:17:12 +0900
changeset 29934 2c6a05b938d8
parent 22947 c63a09b6b337
child 33305 aaa1f8f514cf
permissions -rw-r--r--
revset: fix order of nested 'or' expression (BC) This fixes the order of 'x & (y + z)' where 'y' and 'z' are not trivial. The follow-order 'or' operation is slower than the ordered operation if an input set is large: #0 #1 #2 #3 0) 0.002968 0.002980 0.002982 0.073042 1) 0.004513 0.004485 0.012029 0.075261 #0: 0:4000 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #1: 4000:0 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #2: 10000:0 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #3: file("path:hg") & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) I've tried another implementation, but which appeared to be slower than this version. ss = [getset(repo, fullreposet(repo), x) for x in xs] return subset.filter(lambda r: any(r in s for s in ss), cache=False)

  $ hg init

  $ $PYTHON -c 'file("a", "wb").write("confuse str.splitlines\nembedded\rnewline\n")'
  $ hg ci -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a

  $ echo clean diff >> a
  $ hg ci -mb -d '2 0'

  $ hg diff -r0 -r1
  diff -r 107ba6f817b5 -r 310ce7989cdc a
  --- a/a	Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  +++ b/a	Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
   confuse str.splitlines
   embedded\r (no-eol) (esc)
  newline
  +clean diff