Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 34015:2d80e078724a
tag: use filtered repo when creating new tags (issue5539)
When pruning a changeset that added a tag and then adding another tag, the
"pruned" tag gets restored. This is because the tag creation step (tags._tag()
call in tags.tag()) is currently done on the unfiltered repo. This behavior
has been there from 7977d35df13b which backs out b08af8f0ac01 with no clear
reason but caution on unthought situations at that time. In this changeset, we
pass the filtered repo to tags._tag(), preventing "pruned" tags to reappear.
This somehow restores b08af8f0ac01, though now we arguably have a valid use
case for.
author | Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:25:22 +0200 |
parents | b1f75d8e887a |
children | eb586ed5d8ce |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function > import sys > print('Using custom patch') > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print('--binary found !') > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=$PYTHON ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..