tests/test-hooklib-reject_merge_commits.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:41:09 +0100
changeset 51409 2f39c7aeb549
parent 44413 4cabeea6d214
permissions -rw-r--r--
phases: large rewrite on retract boundary The new code is still pure Python, so we still have room to going significantly faster. However its complexity of the complex part is `O(|[min_new_draft, tip]|)` instead of `O(|[min_draft, tip]|` which should help tremendously one repository with old draft (like mercurial-devel or mozilla-try). This is especially useful as the most common "retract boundary" operation happens when we commit/rewrite new drafts or when we push new draft to a non-publishing server. In this case, the smallest new_revs is very close to the tip and there is very few work to do. A few smaller optimisation could be done for these cases and will be introduced in later changesets. We still have iterate over large sets of roots, but this is already a great improvement for a very small amount of work. We gather information on the affected changeset as we go as we can put it to use in the next changesets. This extra data collection might slowdown the `register_new` case a bit, however for register_new, it should not really matters. The set of new nodes is either small, so the impact is negligible, or the set of new nodes is large, and the amount of work to do to had them will dominate the overhead the collecting information in `changed_revs`. As this new code compute the changes on the fly, it unlock other interesting improvement to be done in later changeset.

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [extensions]
  > hooklib =
  > 
  > [phases]
  > publish = False
  > EOF
  $ hg init a
  $ hg --cwd a debugbuilddag '.:parent.:childa*parent/childa<parent@otherbranch./childa'
  $ hg --cwd a log -G
  o    changeset:   4:a9fb040caedd
  |\   branch:      otherbranch
  | |  tag:         tip
  | |  parent:      3:af739dfc49b4
  | |  parent:      1:66f7d451a68b
  | |  user:        debugbuilddag
  | |  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
  | |  summary:     r4
  | |
  | o  changeset:   3:af739dfc49b4
  | |  branch:      otherbranch
  | |  parent:      0:1ea73414a91b
  | |  user:        debugbuilddag
  | |  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
  | |  summary:     r3
  | |
  +---o  changeset:   2:a6b287721c3b
  | |/   parent:      0:1ea73414a91b
  | |    parent:      1:66f7d451a68b
  | |    user:        debugbuilddag
  | |    date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  | |    summary:     r2
  | |
  o |  changeset:   1:66f7d451a68b
  |/   tag:         childa
  |    user:        debugbuilddag
  |    date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  |    summary:     r1
  |
  o  changeset:   0:1ea73414a91b
     tag:         parent
     user:        debugbuilddag
     date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     summary:     r0
  
  $ hg init b
  $ cat <<EOF >> b/.hg/hgrc
  > [hooks]
  > pretxnchangegroup.reject_merge_commits = \
  >   python:hgext.hooklib.reject_merge_commits.hook
  > EOF
  $ hg --cwd b pull ../a -r a6b287721c3b
  pulling from ../a
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  error: pretxnchangegroup.reject_merge_commits hook failed: a6b287721c3b rejected as merge on the same branch. Please consider rebase.
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: a6b287721c3b rejected as merge on the same branch. Please consider rebase.
  [255]
  $ hg --cwd b pull ../a -r 1ea73414a91b
  pulling from ../a
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files
  new changesets 1ea73414a91b (1 drafts)
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg --cwd b pull ../a -r a9fb040caedd
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files
  new changesets 66f7d451a68b:a9fb040caedd (3 drafts)
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)